edical Negligence Claims for Children in Ireland: The Complete Guide for Parents

Who brings a medical negligence claim for a child in Ireland?

A child under 18 cannot bring a legal claim in their own name under Irish law, so a parent or guardian must act as the child's "next friend" — instructing the solicitor, swearing affidavits, and making decisions about the claim on the child's behalf. The child remains the named plaintiff in the proceedings. Under Order 22 of the Rules of the Superior Courts ⁶, the next friend must have no interest in the case that conflicts with the child's interests.

A detail that catches many parents off guard: the next friend carries personal liability for the defendant's legal costs if the claim fails. While in practice this risk is managed through fee arrangements and after-the-event insurance, it's something your solicitor should explain before proceedings issue.

If the next friend dies or loses capacity during the claim, the claim itself doesn't die — it belongs to the child. The court can appoint a replacement next friend under the Rules of the Superior Courts. Naming a backup next friend at the outset is sensible forward planning, particularly in claims that may take several years to resolve.

When the parent has their own claim too

In birth injury cases, the mother often has her own medical negligence claim (for physical injuries sustained during delivery) running alongside the child's claim. These are legally separate proceedings with different time limits: the mother's claim has a strict two-year deadline from her date of knowledge, while the child's deadline extends to age 20. The mother acts as next friend for the child's claim while simultaneously being the plaintiff in her own right. Different expert reports and different quantum assessments are required for each. Your solicitor will manage both claims, but the key point is that they're distinct: settling one doesn't automatically resolve the other.

What if parents disagree about bringing a claim?

Where separated or divorced parents disagree about pursuing a claim for their child, the court can resolve the dispute. Either parent can apply to be appointed as next friend. The court's decision will be based on the child's best interests, not the parents' wishes. In practice, the parent with primary care responsibilities is usually appointed, but contested next-friend appointments do occur and add time to the process.

What does the next friend actually do?

The role goes beyond signing forms. The next friend is responsible for preserving evidence (medical records, photographs, correspondence), attending consultations with solicitors and medical experts, making strategic decisions about settlement offers, and appearing at the infant ruling hearing where the judge approves the settlement. In paediatric negligence cases where the child may be non-verbal or very young, the next friend also provides the factual narrative of what happened and when symptoms first appeared.

When your child is too young to describe what happened, your documentation becomes the entire case narrative. Write a detailed contemporaneous account of every symptom, every hospital visit, every conversation with medical staff, and every change in your child's condition — dated and timed. Photograph visible symptoms. Keep a diary. These records replace the testimony a verbal child or adult could provide, and they carry significant weight with both experts and judges.

Most children's medical negligence claims in Ireland name the HSE as defendant under the Clinical Indemnity Scheme, not the individual doctor. The State Claims Agency [7] manages the defence. For private hospital treatment, the claim may be against the hospital company or the practitioner's insurer directly.

Three time-limit pathways for children's medical negligence claims

The time limit for a child's medical negligence claim in Ireland depends on which of three statutory pathways applies under Section 5 of the Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act 1991 ³, which suspends the limitation clock while a person is "under a disability" — including both minority and unsound mind. The commonly quoted "until age 20" rule is only one of these three pathways.

When does the "date of knowledge" clock start for a parent?

Under Section 2 of the 1991 Act ³, the limitation clock starts when the parent first knew — or ought reasonably to have known — four things simultaneously: that the child suffered an injury, that the injury was significant, that it was attributable to an act or omission (i.e., connected to medical care), and the identity of the person responsible. For children specifically, the interaction with the minority rule matters: the two-year clock doesn't begin until both the child turns 18 and the parent (or the now-adult child) has knowledge of all four factors — whichever comes later.

What this means practically: if a GP told you your child's developmental delay was "within the normal range" and a specialist only identified the true cause as birth-related brain injury five years later, your date of knowledge may be the date of that specialist's diagnosis — not the date of birth. The two-year clock runs from the later of the child's 18th birthday or that date of knowledge. A detail that surprises many parents: a vague suspicion that something went wrong is not enough to trigger the clock. Reasonable knowledge of all four factors is required. See our full date of knowledge guide.

Five reasons not to wait, even when the deadline extends to age 20 or beyond

Hospital records can be mislaid when requested years after treatment. Medical staff move hospitals, retire, or become unavailable as witnesses. Interim payments for your child's care needs — wheelchairs, therapies, home adaptations — can only be sought once proceedings begin. Courts can dismiss claims for "inordinate and inexcusable delay" even when technically within the limitation period. And preserving evidence early, especially witness accounts from nurses and junior doctors who rotate quickly, is far harder five years after the event than five months.

How does the claim process work for a child in Ireland?

Children's medical negligence claims in Ireland bypass the Injuries Resolution Board entirely and proceed directly to the High Court, where the parent acts as next friend and any settlement requires judicial approval to protect the child's interests. Under Section 3(d) of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003 ⁵, medical negligence claims are exempt from IRB assessment. The claim is issued in the child's name, with the parent or guardian named as next friend.

A claim for a child does not require the child to have reached any minimum age. A parent can instruct a solicitor the day after a negligent event. The child does not need to give evidence or attend consultations. And the next friend does not need to be the biological parent — a legal guardian or a person appointed by the court can act in this role.

Making a formal complaint to the hospital or to HIQA does not prevent you from also bringing a legal claim — and it does not start one either. You can do both simultaneously. One practical consideration: complaint investigation records may become relevant during the legal discovery process, which can work in your favour. See our guide to complaints vs claims.

The process follows this sequence:

1. Obtain medical records. Request your child's complete hospital and GP records under the Data Protection Act 2018 [8]. Hospitals must respond within one month.

2. Commission an independent expert report. An expert in the same specialty as the treating doctor must confirm both a breach of the Dunne standard and that the breach caused the child's injury. Ireland's pool of independent paediatric specialists willing to provide medico-legal reports is small. Experts are frequently sourced from UK teaching hospitals, and the cycle from instruction to report typically runs four to eight months.

3. Issue proceedings. Your solicitor files a Personal Injuries Summons in the High Court. This stops the limitation clock.

4. Exchange of evidence. Both sides exchange expert reports, updated medical records, and quantum assessments. Since April 2025, the new High Court Practice Directions HC131 and HC132 [9] impose stricter pre-trial preparation rules and case management for clinical negligence. All expert reports must be exchanged before a trial date is assigned.

5. Settlement negotiation or trial. If a settlement is reached, it must go before a judge for approval (the infant ruling). If not, the case proceeds to a full hearing in the High Court.

How long does a child's medical negligence claim take?

Each case depends on its facts. These ranges reflect typical experience-based timelines, not guarantees. See our full claim timeline guide for more detail.

↑ Back to top

Court approval: what happens at the infant ruling hearing?

Every medical negligence settlement for a child in Ireland requires formal approval from a High Court judge under Order 22 of the Rules of the Superior Courts — this hearing is called an "infant ruling." Even when both sides agree on a figure, the judge independently reviews the medical evidence, the settlement terms, and whether the amount genuinely serves the child's future interests. The judge can reject a proposed settlement if they believe the amount is too low.

One concern parents frequently raise: will my child have to attend court or give evidence? In the vast majority of infant ruling hearings, the answer is no. The next friend provides a brief account of the circumstances, and the medical reports form the basis of the judge's assessment. For very young children or children with cognitive disabilities, attendance is almost never required.

A barrister's written opinion on the appropriateness of the settlement amount is presented to the judge alongside the medical evidence. The judge has full discretion to approve, reject, or request further evidence before making a decision.

What can a child claim for? (Heads of damage)

Children's medical negligence awards in Ireland cover the same broad categories as adult claims — general damages (pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life) assessed under the Judicial Council's Personal Injuries Guidelines [14], and special damages (quantifiable financial losses). The difference lies in how future losses are calculated. A child has never worked, so Irish courts assess loss of future earnings capacity rather than actual lost income — estimating what the child would probably have earned over a working life. Future care costs, future medical treatment, assistive technology, home adaptations, and specialist education are all recoverable as special damages. For catastrophic injuries, these future-cost elements typically form the largest portion of the settlement. See our compensation guide for further detail.

Where does the compensation go, and can you access it early?

Compensation awarded to a child in Ireland is not paid to the parents — it is lodged with the Accountant of the Courts of Justice ¹ in a court-controlled account invested in government securities until the child turns 18, with interim releases available for specific care needs on application to the court.

Personal injury compensation awarded to a child in Ireland is exempt from income tax and capital gains tax. The settlement itself is tax-free. Interest earned on the court-controlled funds during the holding period may have tax implications once the funds are released, and financial advice at the point of release is worthwhile.

Interim releases: accessing funds before the child turns 18

Parents can apply to the court for interim release of funds for specific care needs directly related to the child's welfare. The court is more likely to approve releases for capital items and specialist treatments such as powered wheelchairs and assistive technology, home adaptations (ramps, accessible bathrooms, sensory rooms), specialist therapies (occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, physiotherapy), and specialist education or care placements. Routine living expenses are less likely to be approved. Each release requires a separate court application supported by evidence of the specific need.

One aspect the official guidance doesn't cover in detail: the application process for interim releases is quicker than most parents expect. With proper supporting documentation — invoices, specialist recommendations, occupational therapy reports — the court can process a release within weeks rather than months.

↑ Back to top

What happens when your child turns 18?

When a child with a medical negligence settlement turns 18 in Ireland, the Accountant of the Courts of Justice releases the funds directly to them — provided they have the mental capacity to manage the money. A separate court application is needed to authorise the release. For children who reach adulthood without cognitive impairment, this process is straightforward.

Children with permanent incapacity: the Assisted Decision-Making Act 2015

For children with catastrophic injuries — severe brain injury, profound intellectual disability — who lack capacity to manage their settlement at 18, the position has changed significantly. The old ward of court system was abolished in April 2023. The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 [10] replaced it with a graduated support framework administered by the Decision Support Service [11].

Under the new system, a parent or family member can be appointed as a decision-making assistant (for minor financial decisions), a co-decision-maker (for joint decisions), or a decision-making representative (for full substitute decision-making, ordered by the Circuit Court). The system focuses on the young adult's own will and preferences rather than the older "best interests" standard. Minor wards of court still in the old system are being transitioned — their wardship is reviewed within six months of turning 18.

The timing matters more than most guides suggest: families should begin planning the capacity transition at least 12 months before the child turns 18. The Decision Support Service application process takes time, and having arrangements in place before the 18th birthday avoids gaps in fund management.

Periodic payment orders: an alternative to lump sums for catastrophic injuries

For children with catastrophic injuries requiring lifelong care in Ireland, the High Court can order periodic payment orders (PPOs) instead of a single lump sum under the Civil Liability (Amendment) Act 2017 [12] — providing guaranteed, index-linked annual payments for the remainder of the child's life. The first Irish PPO was approved by the High Court in February 2019 for a 13-year-old who suffered brain damage at birth — an annual payment of €610,000.

A PPO provides an index-linked annual payment covering future medical care, therapies, assistive technology, and care staff costs. The appeal for families of catastrophically injured children is clear: a lump sum carries the risk of depletion if the child outlives life-expectancy estimates or if investment returns fall short.

What recent changes affect your child's claim? (2025–2026 updates)

Two significant procedural changes since April 2025 directly affect how children's medical negligence claims are managed in the Irish High Court: the new Clinical Negligence List under Practice Directions HC131 and HC132, and the mandatory open disclosure requirements under the Patient Safety Act 2023. The core process — next-friend appointment, expert evidence, High Court proceedings, court-approved settlement — hasn't changed, but these developments affect timing and evidence.

Practice Directions HC131 and HC132: the Clinical Negligence List

From 28 April 2025, the President of the High Court established a dedicated Clinical Negligence List ⁹ with specialist judges and mandatory case management. For families with injured children, the practical effect is significant. Cases now receive structured judicial oversight from an early stage, both sides must exchange expert reports before a trial date is assigned, and the mandatory mediation consideration requirement may lead to earlier settlement discussions. The new list applies to all clinical negligence proceedings regardless of when they were issued.

Children's claims can be mediated under these new rules. Mediation can resolve a claim faster and with less stress than a full hearing. However, any settlement agreed through mediation still requires the same High Court approval as any other children's settlement — the mediator does not replace the judge. The infant ruling hearing happens regardless of how the settlement figure was reached.

Patient Safety (Notifiable Incidents and Open Disclosure) Act 2023

Since 26 September 2024, the Patient Safety Act 2023 [13] requires hospitals to disclose specified serious patient safety incidents to patients and families — including incidents that occur during a child's treatment. If your child's hospital disclosed a notifiable incident, that disclosure may provide critical evidence for a negligence claim. An apology made during a disclosure meeting is not admissible as evidence of liability, but the factual information disclosed can support your case.

If the hospital invites you to an open disclosure meeting about your child's care: attend — the factual information is valuable. Bring a trusted person with you to take notes. Listen carefully and ask questions about what happened, what the consequences are, and what the hospital is doing to address them. Do not sign any document that could limit your right to pursue a legal claim. Do not make a recorded statement without first taking legal advice. The meeting itself is protected, but your own notes of the factual content are yours to keep and share with your solicitor.

CHI hip dysplasia audit: what affected parents should know

More than 2,200 families across Ireland have been notified that their children's hip surgeries between 2021 and 2023 are under review following the Children's Health Ireland (CHI) hip dysplasia audit, which found that a majority of pelvic osteotomies at two major Irish hospitals did not meet the accepted clinical threshold for surgical intervention. The independent audit reported that 79% of pelvic osteotomies at Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital and 60% at Temple Street did not meet the required threshold.

For parents of children who underwent these procedures, the legal implications go beyond standard negligence. Potential grounds include breach of the standard of care (unnecessary surgery), lack of informed consent (parents were not told the clinical threshold was questionable), and systemic governance failures at hospital level. The first step for affected families is to obtain the complete surgical records and any audit correspondence relating to your child. Parents who received recall letters should seek independent legal advice to understand whether their child's specific case has grounds for a claim.

Recent High Court approvals in children's medical negligence cases

↑ Back to top

What might the HSE or State Claims Agency argue in response?

The State Claims Agency defends paediatric medical negligence claims in Ireland vigorously, and parents should be prepared for the arguments they're likely to encounter. Common defence positions include: the treatment met the standard of a reasonably competent practitioner under the Dunne test (Dunne v National Maternity Hospital [1989] IR 91), so no breach occurred; the child's injury resulted from the underlying condition, not from the medical treatment, breaking the chain of causation; the parent or next friend delayed unreasonably in bringing the claim, prejudicing the defendant's ability to investigate under the Statute of Limitations 1957; and contributory factors, such as missed follow-up appointments, reduced the defendant's responsibility under the Civil Liability Act 1961. A strong expert report is the primary tool for countering these positions. The difference between a claim that settles and one that stalls often comes down to whether the claimant's expert directly addresses the causation argument — not just breach.

Mistakes that delay or defeat children's claims

Common questions from parents about children's medical negligence claims

References

[1] Accountant of the Courts of Justice — Courts Service (2026)

[2] Statute of Limitations 1957 — Irish Statute Book

[3] Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act 1991, s.5 — Law Reform Commission Revised Acts

[4] Taking and defending a civil case (minors) — Citizens Information (2026)

[5] Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003, s.3(d) — Irish Statute Book

[6] Minors and Other Persons Under Disability — Rules of the Superior Courts, Courts Service

[7] State Claims Agency — NTMA (2026)

[8] Data Protection Act 2018 — Irish Statute Book

[9] Practice Direction HC132: Clinical Negligence List — Courts Service (April 2025)

[10] Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 — Citizens Information (2026)

[11] Decision Support Service — Legislation and guidance (2026)

[12] Civil Liability (Amendment) Act 2017 (Periodic Payment Orders) — Irish Statute Book

[13] Patient Safety (Notifiable Incidents and Open Disclosure) Act 2023 — Irish Statute Book

[14] Personal Injuries Guidelines — Judicial Council of Ireland (2021)

[15] Civil Liability Act 1961 — Irish Statute Book