Medical Negligence Eligibility in Ireland: Who Can Claim and What Qualifies

Gary Matthews, Medical Negligence Solicitor Dublin

Author: Gary Matthews, Principal Solicitor, Law Society of Ireland PC No. S8178 • 3rd Floor, Ormond Building, 31 to 36 Ormond Quay Upper, Dublin D07 • 01 903 6408

Request a Callback

Or Call Us Now at 01 9036408

Name(Required)
This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different and outcomes vary. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.

A dosage error in Irish medical negligence law is the administration, prescribing, or dispensing of the wrong quantity, strength, concentration, or frequency of a medication, where that error falls below the standard of a reasonably competent practitioner and directly causes avoidable patient harm.

A dosage error becomes medical negligence in Ireland when a healthcare provider administers an incorrect quantity of medication, too high or too low, that directly causes avoidable harm to the patient. Wrong dose or strength errors account for roughly 21 to 23% of all medication incidents reported to the State Claims Agency via NIMS (August 2020) [1], making them the single largest error category in Irish hospitals. Since 26 September 2024, the Patient Safety (Notifiable Incidents and Open Disclosure) Act 2023 [2] requires hospitals to disclose a medication-error death to the patient's family and report it to HIQA within seven days.

Key takeaways

1. Wrong dose or strength errors are the single largest medication incident category in Irish hospitals, accounting for 21 to 23% of all reports to NIMS. 1

2. Medical negligence claims, including dosage errors, bypass the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB) entirely and proceed directly to court under s.3(d) of the PIAB Act 2003. 4

3. The two-year limitation period runs from the date of knowledge, not the date the drug was given, which is critical because dosage-related organ damage (renal failure, hepatotoxicity) may not present for weeks or months. 17

4. Since 26 September 2024, a medication error that causes a patient's death is a notifiable incident under the Patient Safety Act 2023, requiring hospital disclosure to the family and a report to HIQA within seven days. 2

5. Historical SCA litigation data shows a median award of approximately €33,858 for medication claims, with total costs averaging €60,991. 10

What's New (2024 to 2026)

Patient Safety Act 2023 commenced 26 Sept 2024: fatal medication errors now a notifiable incident. HIQA oversight expanded to private hospitals. NMBI published a new Code of Professional Conduct (Feb 2025) updating nursing medication administration standards. National EHR procurement approved Feb 2026, with first regional rollout targeted for 2029. Health Information Bill restored to Dáil order paper.

Eligibility Check

You received the wrong dose, strength, or frequency of a medication in Ireland. The error caused measurable physical or psychological harm. You are within 2 years of discovering the connection.

Before You Start

Request your drug chart and blood results. Note the hospital, ward, date, and drug name. Keep pharmacy receipts and discharge letters. Record symptoms and dates.

This is general guidance, not legal advice. Every case depends on its own facts.

Could you have a dosage error claim? Answer 5 questions to find out.

Answer card: A dosage error (wrong dose, wrong strength, wrong frequency, or failure to adjust for renal or liver function) is a quantitative medication failure. Unlike in England and Wales where the limitation period is 3 years, Irish claimants have 2 years from the date of knowledge under the Statute of Limitations 1957 [3]. Medical negligence claims bypass the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB), formerly the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB), entirely under s.3(d) PIAB Act 2003 [4] and proceed directly to court.

What is a dosage error? A patient receives the wrong quantity, strength, or frequency of a prescribed medication due to a prescribing, calculating, or administering failure.
Who is liable? The prescribing doctor, administering nurse, dispensing pharmacist, or hospital. Liability follows the stage where the error occurred.
Do I go through the IRB? No. Medical negligence claims are exempt under s.3(d) PIAB Act 2003. Proceedings go directly to court.
What is the time limit? Two years from the date you knew (or should have known) the harm was connected to the dosage error.
Contents
IRB exempt: Medical negligence claims bypass the IRB entirely. 4
Wrong dose = largest category: 21 to 23% of all NIMS medication incidents. 1
2-year limit: Runs from date of knowledge, not date of error. Critical for delayed organ damage. 3
Mandatory disclosure: Fatal medication errors must be reported to HIQA within 7 days since 26 Sept 2024. 2
Dosage error claim pathway: identify error, gather records, instruct solicitor, issue proceedings Identify dosage error Drug chart + blood results Request medical records MAR + prescription history Expert pharmacology report Causation opinion Issue court proceedings Bypasses IRB (s.3(d))
Left to right: Identify the dosage error, request records, obtain expert report, issue proceedings (bypassing the IRB).

What is a dosage error?

A dosage error occurs when a patient receives the wrong quantity, strength, concentration, or frequency of a prescribed medication due to a failure in prescribing, calculating, or administering the drug. Dosage errors are distinct from receiving the wrong drug entirely (a selection error) or being given a medication you're allergic to (an allergy documentation failure). The error is quantitative: the right drug, but the wrong numbers.

Common dosage errors in Irish hospitals include decimal-point displacement (prescribing 50mg instead of 5mg), unit confusion (milligrams written as micrograms), failure to adjust the dose for a patient's weight or kidney function, and infusion pump programming errors that deliver medication too fast or too slowly. According to HIQA's medication safety programme, Irish public hospitals experience an estimated three million medication errors per year, approximately one error per hospital patient per day. HIQA Medication Safety Report (2018) [5]

A systemic factor that drives dosage errors in Ireland: the country's patient records remain fragmented and largely paper-based. Handwritten drug charts are misread. Prescription details are transferred between systems via secure email rather than integrated electronic records. In February 2026, the Government approved procurement for a National Electronic Health Record, but the first regional rollout is targeted for 2029, with full coverage by 2032. Department of Health (Feb 2026) [24] Countries with computerised physician order entry (CPOE) have reduced prescribing errors by 48 to 85%. Ireland's continued reliance on manual systems means handwriting-misread errors and transcription failures persist at rates that many comparable health systems have largely eliminated.

Dosage form errors: the same number, a different drug

A dosage form error occurs when a patient receives the correct drug at the correct milligram dose, but in the wrong formulation. Receiving 30mg of immediate-release morphine instead of 30mg extended-release morphine delivers the entire dose in 30 minutes rather than over 12 hours, risking life-threatening respiratory depression. The reverse (extended-release instead of immediate-release) means no pain relief for hours while the patient waits for the slow-release coating to dissolve. Similar risks apply to modified-release versions of calcium channel blockers, opioids, and anti-epileptics. Dosage form errors are frequently caused by selection from look-alike packaging in automated dispensing cabinets, or by prescribers writing "morphine 30mg" without specifying the release type. These errors sit squarely within the scope of a dosage error claim because the amount of active drug reaching the patient's bloodstream at any given time is wrong, even though the total milligrams on the label match the prescription.

The Five Rights: a legal and clinical checklist

Every medication administration must satisfy the "Five Rights" endorsed by the WHO and embedded in the NMBI Code of Professional Conduct (2025) [25]: right patient, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time. Each Right that was breached corresponds to a distinct head of claim. A dosage error is, at its core, a breach of the third Right (right dose), but often involves a concurrent breach of the fifth Right (right time, where a dose was omitted or delayed).

Red flags: how to tell if you received the wrong dose

Many dosage errors go undetected because patients assume their symptoms are normal side effects of the correct medication. According to the State Claims Agency (2020), less than 1% of medication incidents are identified by spontaneous reporting 1, meaning most errors are caught only when symptoms escalate. Knowing what to look for can mean the difference between catching an error early and suffering avoidable long-term harm.

Warning signs that suggest a dosage error
Symptom patternWhat it may indicateWhat to do
New or worsening symptoms shortly after starting or changing a medicationPossible overdose or underdoseContact your prescriber. Do not stop medication without medical advice.
Extreme drowsiness, confusion, or difficulty breathingPossible opioid or sedative overdoseSeek emergency medical attention immediately.
Unexplained bleeding, bruising, or blood in urine/stoolPossible anticoagulant overdoseAttend A&E. Bring the medication packaging.
Tremor, sweating, confusion, rapid heartbeatPossible insulin overdose (hypoglycaemia)Take fast-acting glucose. Call emergency services if unresponsive.
Condition not improving despite treatmentPossible underdose or wrong frequencyRequest a medication review from prescriber.
Medication looks different from usual (different colour, size, or packaging)Possible wrong strength dispensedCheck with pharmacist before taking. Keep the packaging.

The IRB statistics don't capture a critical pattern: many clients first suspected something was wrong when they compared their prescription to a family member's, searched their medication online, or were told by a second clinician that the dose seemed unusual. If your instinct says something is off, check. Request a copy of your drug chart and compare the prescribed dose to the manufacturer's Patient Information Leaflet, available at medicines.ie.

What to do right now if you suspect a dosage error

If you are currently in hospital or have just been discharged and suspect you received the wrong dose, these steps protect both your health and your future legal position. Since 26 September 2024, hospitals have a legal obligation under the Patient Safety Act 2023 2 to disclose notifiable incidents, including fatal medication errors, to the patient's family.

  1. Do not stop or change any medication without medical advice. Abruptly stopping certain drugs (beta-blockers, anti-epileptics, corticosteroids) can cause withdrawal effects that are more dangerous than the dosage error itself.
  2. Ask the attending nurse or doctor to check the drug chart against the prescription. Frame it as a question: "Can you confirm the dose I'm on? I want to make sure I understand my medication." You are entitled to see your own chart.
  3. Request a medication review by the clinical pharmacist. Most Irish acute hospitals have a clinical pharmacy service. Ask for a pharmacist to review your medication list, doses, and blood results.
  4. Before discharge, ask for a printed copy of your Medication Administration Record (MAR) and discharge prescription. Compare the discharge doses to your pre-admission medications. Discrepancies at discharge are one of the most common sources of ongoing dosage errors.
  5. Write down what happened while it's fresh. Date, time, ward, the name of the drug, the dose you believe was wrong, who administered it, and what symptoms you experienced. This contemporaneous note carries significant evidential weight.
  6. If you are at home and suspect a dosage error from a GP or pharmacy prescription, contact your GP or pharmacist to confirm the dose. Keep the medication packaging and the printed prescription label. Do not return or dispose of the medication.

What is NOT a dosage error (and what claim type it may be instead)

Not every bad outcome after taking medication is a dosage error. Clarifying what falls outside the scope of a dosage claim prevents wasted time and helps you identify the correct claim type from the start.

Known side effects at the correct dose are not dosage errors. All medications carry risks listed in the product information. If you received the correct dose and experienced a listed side effect, the issue may be a failure of informed consent (the prescriber didn't warn you) rather than a dosage failure.

Receiving the entirely wrong drug is a selection error, not a dosage error. If you were prescribed Drug A but received Drug B, that's a wrong-drug claim covered by our medication errors hub.

Allergic reactions to correctly dosed medication where the allergy was documented are allergy documentation failures, not dosage errors. See our planned guide on allergy not recorded claims.

Treatment that didn't work despite the correct dose is not negligence if the prescriber's choice of drug and dose was reasonable at the time. Medicine does not guarantee results. The Dunne test asks whether the decision fell below the standard of a competent practitioner, not whether the outcome was ideal.

Dosage errors, dispensing errors, and allergy documentation failures are three legally and clinically distinct claim types in Ireland, and confusing them weakens a case from the start. Each involves different defendants, different regulatory bodies, and different evidence requirements.

How dosage errors differ from other medication failures
Error typeWhat goes wrongTypical defendantRegulator
Dosage error (this page)Wrong dose, strength, frequency, or rate prescribed or administeredPrescribing doctor, administering nurse, hospitalMedical Council / NMBI / HIQA
Dispensing errorPharmacy hands over wrong drug, wrong label, or wrong patient's bagPharmacist, pharmacy businessPharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI) (Updated 2025) [6]
Allergy failureDrug prescribed despite documented allergy or contraindicationPrescriber who failed to check recordsMedical Council

A detail that catches many claimants off guard: if a pharmacist dispenses the correct drug at the dose the doctor prescribed, but the doctor's prescription was wrong, the pharmacist may still share liability. The Pharmacy Act 2007 7 requires pharmacists to exercise independent clinical judgement before dispensing. For pharmacy-specific claims, see our pharmacy dispensing error guide. For allergy-related failures, see our planned guide on allergy not recorded claims.

The 5 stages where dosage errors happen, and who is liable at each

Dosage errors can occur at five distinct stages of the medication use process, and liability attaches to a different healthcare professional at each stage. According to McCullagh et al. (2019), prescribing errors account for 42% and administration errors for 58% of dosage claims that reach litigation in Ireland. McCullagh et al., British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2019) [10] Identifying the exact stage is the first step in building a viable claim.

5-stage medication use pipeline showing where dosage errors occur and who is liable 1. Prescribing Doctor writes dose 42% of claims 2. Transcribing Order transferred Junior doctor/clerk 3. Dispensing Pharmacy prepares Pharmacist 4. Administering Nurse gives drug 58% of claims 5. Monitoring Ongoing oversight Clinical team SCA data: prescribing (stages 1-2) = 42% of litigated claims | administration (stage 4) = 58% of litigated claims McCullagh et al. (2019), 79 medication claims, Clinical Indemnity Scheme 2011 to 2016
The medication journey from prescribing to monitoring. Red percentages show where litigated claims cluster (McCullagh 2019).
The 5-stage medication liability chain in Ireland
StageWhat happensWho is typically liableCommon dosage error
1. PrescribingDoctor writes the dose on the drug chart or e-prescribing systemConsultant, registrar, GPDecimal-point error, wrong unit (mg vs mcg), failure to adjust for renal impairment
2. TranscribingOrder transferred from chart to system or ward round notesJunior doctor, ward clerkHandwriting misread, wrong strength copied
3. DispensingPharmacy prepares and labels the medicationHospital or community pharmacistWrong concentration selected from stock, label error
4. AdministeringNurse or clinician delivers the drug to the patientNurse, midwife, anaesthetistInfusion pump rate error, syringe driver miscalculation, wrong volume drawn up
5. MonitoringOngoing clinical oversight of the patient's response to the drugPrescribing doctor, clinical teamFailure to check blood levels (e.g., INR for warfarin, trough levels for gentamicin), failure to titrate dose

State Claims Agency data covering 2017 to 2018 confirms that prescribing errors accounted for 53 to 59% of all reported medication incidents in Irish acute hospitals, with administration errors the second-largest category. 1 Doctors contributed just 4% of incident reports during this period, a figure the SCA itself flagged as indicating significant underreporting by prescribers.

Which drugs generate the most litigation in Ireland?

The McCullagh study analysed 79 medication-related claims finalised between 2011 and 2016 under the Clinical Indemnity Scheme. Of 48 claims that closed with a payment to the plaintiff, wrong dose or strength was the single most common error type (n=17, roughly 21.5% of all claims). Errors occurred exclusively at the administration stage (58%) and prescribing stage (42%). McCullagh et al. (2019) [16]

Drug classes most frequently litigated in Irish medication claims (2011 to 2016)
Drug classClaims (n)Typical dosage errorCommon injury alleged
General anaesthetics7Wrong concentration, infusion rate errorRespiratory depression, awareness under anaesthesia
Opioids6Dose miscalculation, pump programming errorRespiratory arrest, over-sedation
Penicillins5Allergy not checked, wrong dose for weightAnaphylaxis, treatment failure
Antithrombotics (blood thinners)5INR not checked, dose not adjustedHaemorrhage, stroke
Local anaesthetics5Overdose, wrong site injection volumeNerve damage, cardiac toxicity

The most commonly pleaded injuries across all medication claims were allergic reaction (n=9), deterioration in clinical status (n=9), and post-traumatic stress disorder (n=8). 16 The PTSD figure is striking: many patients who survive a dosage error develop lasting psychological harm from the experience of being told they received a potentially life-threatening wrong dose.

What should have happened: the correct medication safety protocol

Understanding the safety steps that should have been followed helps you identify exactly where the system failed in your case. Irish hospitals are expected to maintain medication safety protocols aligned with HIQA's National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare. For high-alert drugs (the A-PINCH medications), the standard of care requires additional safeguards.

Medication safety steps that should occur before a dose reaches a patient
StepWhat should happenIf it was skipped, it may indicate
Two-patient-identifier checkConfirm patient name and date of birth (or MRN) before administeringDrug given to wrong patient, or wrong patient's dose given
Independent double-check (high-alert drugs)A second clinician independently verifies the dose calculation before administrationSingle-point failure: one person's maths error went unchecked
Allergy band confirmationCheck patient's allergy status on wristband and chart before prescribingAllergy documentation failure (separate claim type)
Blood level monitoring (therapeutic drugs)Check drug levels at prescribed intervals (e.g., gentamicin troughs, INR for warfarin, lithium levels)Monitoring failure: toxic accumulation went undetected
Weight-based dose verification (paediatric, chemotherapy)Confirm patient weight in kilograms on the day. Calculate dose per kg. Verify against maximum safe dose.Calculation error: dose based on wrong weight or wrong formula

Between assessment and settlement, the sticking point is usually which of these steps was missed and whether missing it caused the harm. If your hospital followed all five steps and the error still occurred, the claim becomes harder. If one or more steps were skipped, the breach is clear and documented.

High-alert medications: the A-PINCH drugs

HSE hospitals in Ireland use the A-PINCH protocol to identify medications that carry the highest risk of catastrophic harm when a dosage error occurs. A decimal-point error with a standard painkiller might cause temporary discomfort. The same error with an A-PINCH drug frequently results in irreversible injury or death, and high-value litigation. State Claims Agency: Insulin as High-Risk Medication (2023) [8]

A-PINCH high-alert medications and dosage error consequences
LetterDrug classOverdose consequenceUnderdose consequence
AAnti-infectives (e.g., gentamicin, vancomycin)Renal failure, ototoxicityUncontrolled sepsis, treatment failure
PPotassium (IV) and concentrated electrolytesFatal cardiac arrhythmiaMuscle weakness, cardiac dysfunction
IInsulinsSevere hypoglycaemia, anoxic brain injuryDiabetic ketoacidosis, coma
NNarcotics, opioids, sedativesRespiratory depression, deathUncontrolled pain, withdrawal
CChemotherapy agentsFatal bone marrow suppression, organ toxicityTreatment failure, cancer progression
HHeparin and anticoagulantsCatastrophic haemorrhagePulmonary embolism, stroke

The SCA's published analysis of insulin incidents found that wrong dose, strength, or frequency accounted for 26% of all insulin-related errors, with wrong insulin product at 14% and omitted or delayed insulin at 20%. 8 Insulin products are also vulnerable to look-alike sound-alike (LASA) confusion. Humalog® 100 units/ml versus Humalog® 200 units/ml, for example: a nurse unfamiliar with the higher-strength product can inadvertently deliver double the intended dose.

↑ Back to top

Irish data: what NIMS tells us about dosage failures

Between 2022 and mid-2024, HSE services reported 22,863 medication incidents to the National Incident Management System (NIMS): 8,652 in 2022, 9,540 in 2023, and 4,671 in the first half of 2024 alone. Medical Independent (2024) [9]

Medication incidents reported to NIMS by HSE services, 2022 to mid-2024 Medication incidents reported to NIMS (HSE) 0 5,000 10,000 8,652 2022 9,540 2023 4,671 H1 2024 (6 months only)
Source: Medical Independent (2024), citing HSE NIMS data. H1 2024 covers January to June only. Wrong dose/strength accounts for 21 to 23% of these incidents.

Most incidents were classified as near-misses or no-harm events, but over 20 "category one" incidents during this period caused long-term physical or psychological disability, and 549 incidents required further medical treatment. 9 Wrong dose or strength errors consistently account for 21 to 23% of all reported incidents across multiple SCA reporting periods, ranking as the single largest error category. 1

A category that most guides overlook: an omitted or delayed dose is effectively a dosage error where the dose delivered was zero. NIMS data shows omitted or delayed doses account for 13.9 to 16.1% of all medication incidents. 1 When a time-critical medication (anticoagulant, antibiotic, insulin) is skipped or given hours late, the therapeutic effect is lost. Patients harmed by omitted doses can pursue a dosage error claim on the same legal basis as an overdose or underdose: the dose received (zero) deviated from the dose prescribed.

One aspect the official data doesn't capture: internationally, less than 1% of medication incidents are identified through spontaneous reporting, according to the SCA's own clinical risk team. SCA: Learning Through Medication Incident Reporting (2023) [10] The true scale of dosage errors in Ireland is almost certainly far higher than reported figures suggest.

Proving a dosage error claim under Irish law

Irish courts assess medical negligence claims using the Dunne Principles, established by the Supreme Court in Dunne v National Maternity Hospital [1989] IR 91. The claimant must prove that the healthcare provider was guilty of a failure that no medical practitioner of equal specialist or general status and skill would be guilty of if acting with ordinary care. Courts Service of Ireland (2025) [11]

Dosage error claims have a significant evidential advantage over diagnostic negligence cases. Misdiagnosis claims can be defended under the "schools of thought" principle, where reasonable doctors may disagree on ambiguous symptoms. A mathematical dosage calculation error, a unit confusion, or a failure to follow the published dose in the Irish Medicines Formulary (HSE, 2025) [12] is an objective, measurable deviation from an established protocol. The correct dose is printed in the reference book. The prescribed dose is written on the chart. The gap between them is the breach.

Dunne v National Maternity Hospital [1989] IR 91 (Supreme Court)

Established the standard legal test for medical negligence in Ireland. The claimant must show that no medical practitioner of equal status and skill would have made the same error if exercising ordinary care. For dosage errors, this test applies to the prescribing, calculating, and administering stages.

Why it matters: Dosage errors involving published guidelines (BNF, Irish Medicines Formulary) create a measurable, objective breach standard. courts.ie

Morrissey v HSE, Quest Diagnostics and Medlab Pathology [2020] IESC 6 (Supreme Court)

The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the Dunne Principles remain the correct legal test for all medical negligence claims in Ireland. The court confirmed that a professional is negligent if they apply a standard of approach that no reasonable practitioner of equal status would apply. For dosage errors, this means the court asks whether any competent prescriber or nurse would have administered the same dose in the same circumstances.

Why it matters: As the most recent Supreme Court authority on the standard of care, this case confirms the Dunne test applies to every medical negligence claim including medication dosage errors. courts.ie

The difference between a successful and unsuccessful dosage claim often comes down to a single question: can you prove the wrong dose, not the patient's underlying condition, caused the specific harm?

↑ Back to top

Why causation is harder than you think

Establishing that a dose was incorrect proves breach of duty, but breach alone doesn't win a claim. The claimant must also pass the "but for" test: on the balance of probabilities, would the injury have occurred but for the dosage error? Under the Dunne Principles 11, the court requires expert evidence connecting the specific dosage failure to the specific harm suffered.

Wrong-drug errors are often binary. You received Drug A instead of Drug B, and the resulting allergic reaction clearly came from Drug A. Dosage errors are graduated. Was the difference between 10mg and 5mg enough to cause this specific harm in this specific patient? Defendants, typically the State Claims Agency acting for the HSE, routinely argue that the patient's underlying condition, not the dosage miscalculation, caused the deterioration.

Overcoming this defence requires a specialist pharmacology expert report, not a standard medical report. An independent consultant pharmacologist, toxicologist, or relevant specialist (endocrinologist for insulin errors, oncologist for chemotherapy miscalculations) must forensically link the specific microgram overdose or underdose to the physiological damage. We call this the Dose-to-Damage Causation Chain, four elements your expert must establish:

The Dose-to-Damage Causation Chain: 4 elements that must be proven 1. Dose Deviation Dose outside accepted range for this patient 2. Measurable Effect Blood levels outside therapeutic range 3. Specific Injury Renal failure, brain injury, haemorrhage, etc. 4. But-For Link Injury would not have occurred at correct dose All 4 elements must be proven on the balance of probabilities. Your pharmacology expert report must address each one.
The Dose-to-Damage Causation Chain: all 4 elements must be established by your expert to prove the dosage error caused the harm.
  1. The prescribed or administered dose deviated from the accepted range for this patient's weight, age, and organ function
  2. The deviation produced a measurable pharmacological effect (blood levels outside therapeutic range, toxic metabolite accumulation, or drug-induced organ stress)
  3. The pharmacological effect caused the specific injury (renal failure, brain injury, haemorrhage, or other documented harm)
  4. The injury would not have occurred at the correct dose, on the balance of probabilities

The most difficult dosage error claims we see involve chronic under-dosing. A GP who fails to increase a blood pressure medication over months. An anticoagulant that's never checked against blood results. The patient deteriorates slowly, and connecting that gradual decline to the dose takes specialist pharmacological evidence that general practitioners aren't qualified to provide.

Worked example: how a dosage error claim unfolds in practice

The following scenario is constructed from common clinical patterns. It does not describe a specific case or client.

Gentamicin dosage error timeline: day-by-day progression from error to harm D1 320mg prescribed No renal adjustment D2 320mg given again No trough levels ordered D3 Drug accumulating Still no monitoring D4 Urine output drops Family notices change D5 Bloods taken Creatinine 480 Trough 4.2 (target <1) AKI Acute kidney injury diagnosed eGFR was 38 (known). Guidelines required dose reduction + trough monitoring every 24 to 48 hours. Neither was done.
Day-by-day timeline of the gentamicin scenario. The error compounds each day without monitoring.

The error. A 72-year-old man with an eGFR of 38 (indicating moderate kidney impairment) is prescribed gentamicin 320mg once daily for a post-operative wound infection. The Irish Medicines Formulary specifies that gentamicin must be dose-adjusted for renal function. At an eGFR of 38, the standard adult dose of 5mg/kg should be reduced and trough levels monitored every 24 to 48 hours. Neither adjustment is made. No trough levels are checked for five days.

The harm. On day five, the patient's daughter notices he is producing very little urine. Blood tests reveal a creatinine level of 480 (normal range: 60 to 110) and a gentamicin trough of 4.2 (target: below 1). He is diagnosed with acute kidney injury directly caused by gentamicin toxicity. He requires temporary dialysis and is left with permanent stage-3 chronic kidney disease.

The evidence. The drug chart shows 320mg daily prescribed with no renal adjustment note. The blood results show a pre-existing eGFR of 38 that was available to the prescriber. The MAR confirms five consecutive days of administration. No trough level was ordered until day five.

Breach. The prescribing guidelines are explicit: adjust for renal function, monitor trough levels. The prescriber deviated from a published, measurable standard. Under the Dunne test, no competent prescriber would have prescribed a full unadjusted dose to a patient with an eGFR of 38 without monitoring.

Causation. The pharmacology expert applies the Dose-to-Damage Causation Chain. The dose exceeded the safe range for this patient's kidney function (element 1). Toxic trough levels confirm the drug accumulated (element 2). The creatinine rise and dialysis requirement demonstrate renal injury (element 3). At the correct adjusted dose with monitoring, the expert concludes on the balance of probabilities that the acute kidney injury would not have occurred (element 4).

Likely defence. "The patient already had impaired kidney function. His kidneys would have deteriorated regardless." The expert's response: the eGFR was stable at 38 for two years before admission. The acute decline from 38 to the level requiring dialysis occurred within five days of unadjusted gentamicin. The temporal and pharmacological link is direct.

Defendant. The HSE, defended by the State Claims Agency under the Clinical Indemnity Scheme. The prescribing registrar bears primary liability. The hospital's failure to have a gentamicin prescribing protocol (or failure to enforce one) supports a systems-level claim.

Which expert do you need? Matching the specialist to the drug

Standard medical reports from GPs or general physicians are not sufficient for dosage error claims involving complex pharmacological causation. Your solicitor must commission the right specialist for the specific drug class involved.

Expert witness types by dosage error category
Drug class involvedPrimary expert neededWhy this specialist
InsulinConsultant endocrinologist + clinical pharmacologistCan interpret glucose logs, HbA1c trends, and insulin pharmacokinetics
Anticoagulants (warfarin, heparin, DOACs)Consultant haematologistUnderstands INR targets, bridging therapy protocols, and bleed causation
Chemotherapy agentsConsultant oncologist + clinical pharmacologistCan verify body-surface-area calculations and assess whether toxicity was dose-related
Aminoglycosides (gentamicin, vancomycin)Consultant in infectious diseases or clinical pharmacologyInterprets trough/peak levels and renal-adjustment protocols
Opioids and anaesthetic agentsConsultant anaesthetist + toxicologistUnderstands respiratory depression thresholds and reversal agent timing
GP repeat prescriptions (chronic medication)Clinical pharmacologist or relevant organ specialistCan assess whether the GP's failure to titrate or review caused the gradual harm

From handling dosage error cases in Irish courts, the commissioning of the wrong type of expert is the single most common avoidable delay. A general surgeon cannot give a causation opinion on insulin pharmacokinetics. An endocrinologist cannot assess anticoagulant dosing protocols. Match the expert to the drug class from the outset.

↑ Back to top

How defendants fight dosage error claims

The State Claims Agency and private hospital insurers deploy predictable defence strategies in dosage error litigation. Understanding these defences before you file helps your solicitor build a case that pre-empts them.

"The patient's underlying condition caused the harm, not the dose." The most common defence. If a patient with advanced kidney disease receives a nephrotoxic drug at the wrong dose, the defendant argues that the kidneys would have failed regardless. Your pharmacology expert must isolate the dose-attributable damage from the pre-existing deterioration. Blood levels taken before and after the error are the critical evidence.

"The dose was within an acceptable clinical range." Prescribing guidelines often specify a range (e.g., 5 to 20mg). If the prescribed dose falls within the published range, the defendant argues no breach occurred, even if the dose was inappropriate for this particular patient's weight, age, or organ function. Your expert must show that a competent prescriber would have selected a different dose within the range for this specific patient.

"The patient contributed to the harm." Contributory negligence applies if the patient failed to follow instructions, took additional unprescribed medication, or missed follow-up appointments where the dose would have been reviewed. Under Irish law, the court can reduce damages by the percentage of fault attributed to the patient. An honest account of your own actions protects against late surprises at trial.

"The error was detected and corrected before harm occurred." Near-misses are not compensable in the same way as actual harm. If the wrong dose was prescribed but intercepted by the pharmacist or nurse before administration, no physical injury occurred. Psychological distress from learning you were nearly given a dangerous dose may be compensable in limited circumstances, but the threshold is high.

Since 26 September 2024, a patient death associated with a medication error is a "notifiable incident" under Schedule 1, item 1.8 of the Patient Safety (Notifiable Incidents and Open Disclosure) Act 2023. 2 Hospitals, both public and private, must now hold a mandatory disclosure meeting with the patient's family and report the incident to HIQA within seven calendar days. HSE: Patient Safety Act Implementation (Updated 2025) [13]

The practical significance for claimants is substantial. Hospitals must tell you what happened. The mandatory open disclosure meeting requires truthful, timely information about the medication error and its consequences. Apologies given during disclosure cannot be used as admissions of liability in subsequent legal proceedings, a protection designed to encourage honesty. 2 HIQA receives the incident notification, creating an independent regulatory record that your solicitor can reference. Non-compliance is a criminal offence, carrying a Class A fine of up to €5,000 for failure to disclose. 2 HIQA's remit now extends to private hospitals, closing a gap in oversight that previously left private-sector dosage errors without equivalent regulatory scrutiny.

Unlike in England and Wales, where the duty of candour framework operates under professional regulation rather than statute, Ireland's 2023 Act creates a criminal sanction for non-disclosure, a materially stronger enforcement mechanism.

The 2023 Act is not the only recent regulatory shift. The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (NMBI) published a new Code of Professional Conduct effective February 2025, updating the medication administration standards that apply to every nurse who delivers a dose at the bedside (stage 4 of the medication use process). NMBI Code of Professional Conduct (2025) [25] Where a nurse administers an incorrect dose, the updated Code defines the standard of care against which breach is measured. Solicitors handling dosage error claims should reference this 2025 edition, not the older 2014 version that some hospitals still display on wards.

Elderly, paediatric, and renal patients: heightened risk

Dosage errors cause disproportionate harm in three patient populations where standard adult doses are inappropriate: elderly patients on multiple medications, children requiring weight-based calculations, and patients with impaired kidney or liver function.

Elderly patients and polypharmacy. Age-related decline in kidney and liver function changes how the body processes drugs. A dose that's safe for a 40-year-old may accumulate to toxic levels in an 80-year-old. Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of five or more medications, increases the risk of drug interactions and compounding dosage errors. According to the HIQA Medication Safety Monitoring Programme (2018) [14], one in three Irish public hospitals had no formal medication safety strategy during the inspection period, raising particular concerns about elderly patients in complex medication regimes.

Paediatric patients. Children's doses are calculated per kilogram of body weight, a method that introduces mathematical complexity absent from adult prescribing. A decimal-point error in a child's weight, or a failure to convert between kilograms and pounds, can produce a tenfold overdose.

Renal impairment. Many drugs are cleared through the kidneys. When kidney function is reduced, standard doses accumulate to dangerous levels. Prescribers are required to check the patient's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and adjust the dose accordingly. Failure to do so, particularly with nephrotoxic drugs like gentamicin or vancomycin, represents a clear, documentable breach of prescribing guidelines.

New risk since September 2024: pharmacist prescription extensions. Under the Community Pharmacy Agreement 2025, pharmacists can now extend certain prescriptions without contacting the prescriber. If the original prescription contained an incorrect dose and the pharmacist extends it without review, the patient continues receiving the wrong dose for an additional period. This creates a new liability question: does the extending pharmacist share responsibility for perpetuating a prescribing error? This area of law is untested in Ireland, but the principle of independent clinical judgement under the Pharmacy Act 2007 suggests the extending pharmacist has a duty to review the dose before continuing it.

GP repeat prescription failures: the most common community dosage error

The single most common dosage error scenario for patients searching from home is a GP who auto-renews a repeat prescription without reviewing whether the dose is still appropriate. According to the Medical Council's Guide to Professional Conduct, doctors must review patients' medication at regular intervals and adjust treatment where clinically indicated. 26 A patient has been on the same blood pressure medication for three years. The GP keeps issuing repeat prescriptions without checking blood pressure readings, kidney function, or whether the dose should be titrated upward. The patient's hypertension worsens silently, eventually causing a stroke or heart attack that an adjusted dose would have prevented.

GP repeat prescription dosage errors are legally distinct from hospital errors in three ways. First, the defendant is the GP personally (or the GP practice), not the HSE. The Clinical Indemnity Scheme does not cover independent GP practices unless they are HSE-employed. Second, the prescribing "error" is not a one-off miscalculation but a sustained failure to monitor and adjust over months or years, making causation harder to pinpoint to a single event. Third, the "date of knowledge" is often much later because the harm accumulates gradually and the patient has no reason to question their long-standing medication until a crisis occurs.

The Medical Council's Guide to Professional Conduct requires doctors to review patients' medication at regular intervals and adjust treatment where indicated. Medical Council of Ireland (Updated 2025) [26] A GP who issues repeat prescriptions for years without a medication review is not exercising the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent general practitioner. For a full analysis of GP-specific claims, see our GP negligence guide.

Transition-of-care errors: when dosage errors happen between settings

The highest-risk moment for a dosage error is not during a single hospital stay. It is when a patient moves between care settings: admission, ward transfer, or discharge. Medication reconciliation, the process of comparing a patient's pre-existing medication list against what is prescribed in the new setting, is where doses get lost, duplicated, or changed without explanation.

The State Claims Agency's data confirms that medication reconciliation incidents were the largest single category of medication adverse events reported to the Clinical Indemnity Scheme. 1 HIQA published specific guidance on medication reconciliation precisely because these transition points generate so many errors. HIQA Medication Reconciliation Guidance (2016) [28]

Three transition scenarios that commonly produce dosage error claims in Ireland:

Admission. A patient arrives at hospital on five medications at home. The admitting doctor transcribes the list from the patient's verbal account or a GP letter. One dose is written as 25mg instead of 2.5mg. The error persists throughout the admission because each subsequent prescriber copies the chart without checking.

Discharge. The discharge prescription lists different doses from the inpatient chart. The GP receives the discharge summary weeks later (or not at all) and continues prescribing the pre-admission dose while the patient takes the discharge dose. The patient is now on a different dose from what either doctor intended.

Ward transfer. A patient transferred from ICU to a general ward has their infusion medications converted to oral doses. The conversion calculation is wrong, or the oral equivalent is not available and a different drug is substituted at a non-equivalent dose.

How much compensation can you expect?

Compensation for dosage error claims in Ireland follows the same framework as all medical negligence cases: general damages for pain and suffering, assessed under the Judicial Council Personal Injuries Guidelines (2021) [15], plus special damages for quantifiable financial losses. Awards vary case by case depending on the severity and duration of the injury.

Historical litigation data analysing Irish State Claims Agency records indicates that the median total cost of medication-related claims is approximately €60,991, with median damages awarded to plaintiffs around €33,858. McCullagh et al., medication-related litigation in Ireland: a 6-year review (2019) [16] High-alert medication errors involving catastrophic injury (anoxic brain damage from insulin overdose, fatal haemorrhage from anticoagulant miscalculation) can result in awards substantially above this median.

For a detailed analysis of how general and special damages are calculated, see our medical negligence compensation guide.

Time limits and the date-of-knowledge problem

Irish medical negligence claims must be brought within two years of the "date of knowledge", the date you first knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the harm was connected to the dosage error. Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 [17]

Dosage errors create a particular date-of-knowledge challenge. A patient may receive a toxic dose during a hospital stay, but the resulting organ damage (renal failure, hepatotoxicity, bone marrow suppression) may remain latent and undetected until a routine blood test weeks or months later. The two-year clock doesn't necessarily start on the day the drug was administered. It begins when the patient first realised, or reasonably ought to have realised, that their clinical harm was connected to the preceding medication error.

One detail that surprises clients: many discover a dosage error only when a second doctor or pharmacist says "this dose is wrong for you." That moment, not the original prescription date, is your likely date of knowledge.

How quickly does dosage damage become detectable?

Typical detection latency by drug class (indicative, not exhaustive)
Drug classTypical harmDetection windowWhat usually triggers discovery
Aminoglycosides (gentamicin)Nephrotoxicity, hearing lossDays to 2 weeksRising creatinine on blood test, tinnitus
Anticoagulants (warfarin, heparin)Haemorrhage or thrombosisDays to weeksUnexplained bleeding, INR result
InsulinHypoglycaemic brain injuryHours to daysCollapse, confusion, glucose reading
Chronic medication (blood pressure, thyroid)Organ damage from under-dosing or over-dosingWeeks to monthsRoutine blood test, new symptoms, second opinion
ChemotherapyBone marrow suppression, organ toxicityDays to weeksBlood count results, infection, unexplained bruising

The detection window directly affects your limitation period. A gentamicin overdose producing renal symptoms within a week gives you a clear date of knowledge. Chronic under-dosing of a blood pressure medication may take months to connect to the slow deterioration, extending the discovery window significantly.

Distinct exceptions apply: for minors, the two-year limit only commences on their 18th birthday. For individuals lacking mental capacity, the timeframe is paused until capacity is regained. 17 For a full analysis of limitation periods, see our time limits guide and date of knowledge page.

↑ Back to top

Evidence that strengthens a dosage error claim

The foundation of every dosage error claim is the prescription chart (drug chart) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR), the documents that show exactly what was prescribed and what was actually given. Under the Data Protection Act 2018 20, hospitals must provide copies of your medical records within 30 days of a written request.

Key evidence for dosage error claims
DocumentWhat it provesHow to obtain it
Inpatient drug chartEvery medication prescribed: dose, route, frequencyWritten request to hospital under Data Protection Act 2018
Medication Administration Record (MAR)What was actually given, by whom, and whenSame medical records request
Blood test results (INR, drug levels, eGFR)Whether the drug reached toxic or sub-therapeutic levelsHospital or GP records request
Infusion pump electronic logsProgrammed rates and volumes for IV medicationsHospital records request (request promptly as logs may be overwritten)
NIMS incident report (if filed)That the hospital itself identified the error internallyFreedom of Information request to HSE
HPRA adverse reaction reportContemporaneous patient-filed record of the adverse eventFile at HPRA (Updated 2025) [18]
Discharge summaryMedications on discharge (check doses match what was prescribed during admission)Given at discharge. If not received, request from hospital.

The timing matters more than most guides suggest: request CCTV and electronic records within days, not weeks. Many hospitals overwrite digital logs on rolling schedules, and internal incident reports may be amended if the investigation is ongoing.

Reporting a dispensing error to the PSI

If the dosage error occurred at the dispensing stage, where a pharmacist supplied the wrong strength or gave incorrect dosage instructions, you can file a complaint with the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI) alongside your civil claim. 6

The PSI received 80 complaints in 2021, a significant increase from 46 in 2017. Dispensing errors and pharmacy practice issues consistently make up the largest complaint categories. PSI Annual Reports (Updated 2025) [19] The fitness-to-practise process under the Pharmacy Act 2007 can result in sanctions ranging from censure to cancellation of the pharmacist's registration.

A PSI complaint is a regulatory matter. It doesn't directly produce compensation. But the regulatory investigation can generate evidence (expert reports, admissions, findings of professional misconduct) that strengthens your separate civil claim. Both tracks can run in parallel.

Reporting a prescribing doctor to the Medical Council

If the dosage error was a prescribing failure by a doctor, the regulatory complaint goes to the Medical Council of Ireland 26, not the PSI. The Medical Council received 353 complaints in 2023, up from 301 the previous year. Medical Independent (May 2025) [27] Complaints are assessed by the Preliminary Proceedings Committee (PPC), and serious cases are referred to a Fitness to Practise Inquiry. The Council can advise, admonish, suspend, or erase a doctor from the register. Sanctions involving erasure must be confirmed by the High Court.

Two practical points. First, the Medical Council cannot award compensation. It's a professional standards body, not a court. Second, the Clinical Indemnity Scheme does not cover Medical Council complaints, only civil claims. Doctors facing a Council complaint must arrange their own separate legal representation. Both a Medical Council complaint and a civil claim can proceed in parallel.

↑ Back to top

Step-by-step: how to bring a dosage error claim

Estimated effort: initial consultation 30 to 60 minutes. What you need: medication details, hospital name, approximate date, description of harm.

  1. Seek immediate medical attention if you are experiencing adverse effects from a suspected dosage error.
  2. Request your medical records, specifically the drug chart, MAR, and blood test results. Hospitals must respond within 30 days under the Data Protection Act 2018. 20
  3. Instruct a medical negligence solicitor. Dosage claims bypass the IRB under s.3(d) PIAB Act 2003 and proceed directly to court or settlement negotiations.
  4. Obtain an expert pharmacology report. Your solicitor commissions an independent specialist to assess breach and causation using the Dose-to-Damage Causation Chain.
  5. Issue a Section 8 letter of claim under the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004, s.8 17, notifying the defendant.
  6. Court proceedings or settlement. Public hospital claims typically proceed against the HSE, managed by the State Claims Agency under the Clinical Indemnity Scheme (Updated 2025) [21].

How long does a dosage error claim take?

Dosage error claims in Ireland typically take 18 months to 4 years from instruction to resolution, depending on the complexity of the pharmacological evidence, the severity of the injury, and whether liability is contested. Medical negligence claims bypass the IRB under s.3(d) of the PIAB Act 2003 4, proceeding directly to litigation, which adds to timelines compared with standard personal injury claims.

Indicative timelines for dosage error claims (not guarantees)
ScenarioTypical rangeWhat drives the timeline
Clear overdose, liability admitted, moderate injury18 to 24 monthsSpeed of medical records, expert availability, recovery plateau
Disputed causation, single high-alert drug2 to 3 yearsDuelling pharmacology experts, defendant's own expert timeline
Complex polypharmacy, pre-existing conditions3 to 4+ yearsMultiple experts needed, difficulty isolating dose-attributable damage
Fatal dosage error, wrongful death claim2 to 4 yearsCoroner's inquest may precede civil proceedings, multiple dependants

What the timeline estimates don't account for: court scheduling delays in the High Court, which currently add 6 to 12 months in many medical negligence cases. Settlements reached before trial can shorten the process significantly.

Common Questions

How do I prove a dosage error was negligent, not just a mistake?

A dosage error becomes actionable negligence when the prescribed or administered dose deviates from established pharmacological guidelines and that deviation directly causes harm.

The Dunne Principles 11 require proof that no competent practitioner exercising ordinary care would have made the same error. An independent pharmacology expert must link the specific dose deviation to your injury. The drug chart and blood test results are the primary evidence.

Why it matters: Not every dosage error causes compensable harm. The causation link separates a clinical incident from a legal claim.

Next step: How to prove medical negligenceExpert medical report guide

Do dosage error claims go through the Injuries Resolution Board?

No. All medical negligence claims, including dosage error cases, are exempt from the IRB (formerly PIAB) process under s.3(d) of the PIAB Act 2003. Proceedings are issued directly in court.

The High Court handles claims valued above €60,000 (the current Circuit Court limit for personal injury actions). The Circuit Court handles claims at or below that threshold. Public hospital claims are defended by the State Claims Agency. Courts Service of Ireland (2025)

Why it matters: Claimants don't face the IRB assessment step, but they do need specialist legal representation from the outset.

Next step: Citizens Information: IRB exemptions (2025) [22]

What is the time limit for a dosage error claim?

Two years from the date of knowledge, the date you first knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the harm was connected to the dosage error. 17 For minors, the clock starts at age 18.

Delayed organ damage (renal failure, hepatotoxicity) may not appear for weeks or months. The limitation period runs from discovery, not from the date the drug was given. Individuals lacking mental capacity have additional protections.

Why it matters: Dosage errors are uniquely prone to late discovery. Acting promptly preserves evidence.

Next step: Time limits for medical negligence claimsDate of knowledge explained

Who is liable for a dosage error: the doctor, nurse, or pharmacist?

Liability depends on which stage of the medication use process the error occurred. Prescribing errors fall on the doctor. Administration errors fall on the nurse. Dispensing errors fall on the pharmacist. Multiple parties can share liability.

The 5-stage liability chain identifies who failed at which point. Hospitals bear vicarious liability for employed staff. The State Claims Agency defends public hospital staff under the Clinical Indemnity Scheme.

Why it matters: Identifying the correct defendant determines whether you pursue the HSE (via the SCA) or a private practitioner's insurer.

Next step: Claims against the HSEState Claims Agency role

How much compensation can I get for a dosage error?

Compensation depends on the severity of the injury, not the size of the dosage error. According to McCullagh et al. (2019), SCA data shows a median award of approximately €33,858 for medication litigation, with total claim costs averaging €60,991. 10 Awards vary case by case.

General damages follow the Judicial Council Personal Injuries Guidelines (2021). Special damages cover medical costs, lost earnings, and future care. Catastrophic A-PINCH drug errors can result in awards substantially above median levels.

Why it matters: Realistic expectations inform evidence planning and expert selection.

Next step: Compensation guideWhat can you claim for?

What does the Patient Safety Act 2023 mean for my claim?

Since 26 September 2024, hospitals must hold a mandatory open disclosure meeting if a medication error causes a patient's death (Schedule 1, item 1.8). 2 The information disclosed and any apology given cannot be used as an admission of liability.

Both public and private hospitals are covered. HIQA must be notified within 7 calendar days. Non-disclosure carries a fine of up to €5,000.

Why it matters: The Act creates a legal right to information that was previously disclosed only at the hospital's discretion.

Next step: Patient Safety Act 2023 (full text) 2

Are elderly patients more at risk from dosage errors?

Yes. Age-related changes in kidney and liver function, combined with polypharmacy (taking 5 or more medications), significantly increase the risk and severity of dosage errors in older patients.

Standard adult doses may accumulate to toxic levels. Nursing home residents face particular risk from inadequate medication review. HIQA inspects medication safety in designated centres for older people.

Should I report a suspected dosage error to the HPRA?

Yes. If you experienced an adverse reaction from an incorrect dose, reporting it to the Health Products Regulatory Authority strengthens the evidence trail. Reports from patients and carers are accepted alongside healthcare professional reports.

Report online at hpra.ie 18 or by freepost. Reports are stored in the national adverse reactions database. The report can support your civil claim as contemporaneous evidence.

Can I still claim if I took the medication incorrectly?

Possibly. Irish law applies contributory negligence, meaning the court can reduce your damages by the percentage of fault attributed to you. If you took double the prescribed dose because the instructions were unclear, you may bear partial responsibility, but the prescriber or pharmacist who gave ambiguous instructions also bears fault.

Courts assess whether a reasonable patient in your position would have acted differently. If you missed follow-up appointments where the dose would have been reviewed, that may reduce your award. It won't necessarily eliminate the claim entirely. An honest account of your own actions, provided early to your solicitor, prevents damaging surprises at trial.

Why it matters: Defendants routinely raise contributory negligence. Preparing for it strengthens your position.

Next step: Common defences in medical negligence claims

Can I claim if the dosage error was caught before it reached me?

No, in most cases. A near-miss, where the wrong dose was prescribed but intercepted before administration, does not cause physical injury. Without physical harm, a standard negligence claim for compensation is extremely difficult to sustain.

In limited circumstances, the psychological distress of being told you were nearly given a lethal dose may be compensable. The threshold is high: you would need to demonstrate a recognised psychiatric condition (not just worry or shock) caused by the near-miss. Most near-miss scenarios don't meet this bar.

What to consider next

What if the error happened in a private hospital? Private hospital dosage errors follow the same legal framework, but the defendant is the hospital or consultant's private insurer rather than the State Claims Agency. Since 26 September 2024, private hospitals are also subject to mandatory open disclosure under the Patient Safety Act 2023 and fall within HIQA's expanded oversight remit.

What if the error involved a child? Paediatric dosage errors are particularly serious because children's doses are calculated per kilogram. For minors, the two-year limitation period doesn't begin until the child turns 18. A parent or guardian brings the claim as "next friend." See our claims for children guide.

What if the patient died from the dosage error? Family members may bring a wrongful death claim under the Civil Liability Act 1961. 23 Dependants can claim for mental distress and, where applicable, financial dependency. See our wrongful death claims guide.

References

  1. State Claims Agency, Medication Incidents Report: A Review of Medication Incidents Reported by Irish Acute Hospitals (2017 to 2018), August 2020. stateclaims.ie
  2. Patient Safety (Notifiable Incidents and Open Disclosure) Act 2023 (Act 10 of 2023). irishstatutebook.ie
  3. Statute of Limitations 1957, s.11 (as amended by Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act 1991). irishstatutebook.ie
  4. Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003, s.3(d), medical negligence exemption. irishstatutebook.ie
  5. HIQA, Medication Safety Monitoring Programme Overview Report, 2018. hiqa.ie
  6. Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI), Pharmacy Regulator, Complaints Process. psi.ie
  7. Pharmacy Act 2007. irishstatutebook.ie
  8. State Claims Agency, Insulin: A High-Risk Medication, Clinical Risk Insights. stateclaims.ie
  9. Medical Independent, "Over 22,800 medication incidents reported by HSE in 30 months", 2024. medicalindependent.ie
  10. State Claims Agency, Learning Through Medication Incident Reporting (NIMS 2019 to 2022 data), 2023. stateclaims.ie
  11. Courts Service of Ireland. courts.ie
  12. HSE National Medicines Information Centre / Irish Medicines Formulary. hse.ie
  13. HSE, Patient Safety (Notifiable Incidents and Open Disclosure) Act 2023, Implementation Guidance. healthservice.hse.ie
  14. HIQA, Medication Safety Monitoring Programme in Public Acute Hospitals. hiqa.ie
  15. Judicial Council, Personal Injuries Guidelines, 2021. judicialcouncil.ie
  16. McCullagh M, et al., "Medication related litigation in Ireland: A 6-year review", British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2019. PMC6710498
  17. Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004. irishstatutebook.ie
  18. Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), Reporting suspected side effects. hpra.ie
  19. Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland, Annual Reports and Financial Statements. psi.ie
  20. Data Protection Act 2018. irishstatutebook.ie
  21. State Claims Agency, Clinical Indemnity Scheme. stateclaims.ie
  22. Citizens Information, Injuries Resolution Board. citizensinformation.ie
  23. Civil Liability Act 1961. irishstatutebook.ie
  24. Department of Health, "Minister announces Government approval to commence procurement for a National Electronic Health Record", February 2026. gov.ie
  25. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (NMBI), Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics, effective February 2025. nmbi.ie
  26. Medical Council of Ireland, Making a Complaint. medicalcouncil.ie
  27. Medical Independent, "How to avoid a Medical Council complaint" (353 complaints in 2023), May 2025. medicalindependent.ie
  28. HIQA, Guidance on Medication Reconciliation (reducing medication errors at transitions in care). hiqa.ie

Expand your knowledge

Medication Errors and Medical Negligence Claims (Hub)

How to Prove Medical Negligence in Ireland

Medical Negligence Compensation Guide

Expert Medical Report: What It Is and Why You Need One

Related internal guides: Pharmacy dispensing errorsHospital negligenceGP negligenceNursing home negligenceCausation explained

Gary Matthews Solicitors

Medical negligence solicitors, Dublin

We help people every day of the week (weekends and bank holidays included) that have either been injured or harmed as a result of an accident or have suffered from negligence or malpractice.

Contact us at our Dublin office to get started with your claim today

Gary Matthews Solicitors
Call Us