Elderly Slip and Fall Claims in Ireland: How Age Changes Everything
Author: Gary Matthews, Principal Solicitor, Law Society of Ireland PC No. S8178 · 3rd Floor, Ormond Building, 31-36 Ormond Quay Upper, Dublin D07 · 01 903 6408 ·
An elderly slip and fall claim in Ireland typically results in higher compensation than the same accident involving a younger person. Age amplifies injury severity, recovery time, and care costs. The Occupiers' Liability Act 1995 [1] requires premises owners to keep visitors safe, and the eggshell skull rule under Irish tort law means a defendant must take the claimant as they find them, including age-related vulnerability such as osteoporosis. Data from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA, 2024) [2] shows 40% of people over 50 in Ireland experience a fall within any two-year period.
This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different and outcomes vary. Consult a qualified solicitor for advice specific to your situation.
This guide covers elderly slip and fall claims in public and commercial premises in Ireland, such as supermarkets, footpaths, hotels, shops, and car parks. Falls inside nursing homes or residential care facilities involve different legal duties and are not covered here. Road traffic accidents involving elderly pedestrians fall under a separate claims category.
At a glance: Elderly claimants are protected by the eggshell skull rule under Irish tort law. Falls cause disproportionately severe injuries in older people, often resulting in hip fractures, loss of independence, and residential care needs. The two-year limitation period applies, but early legal action is critical because evidence disappears quickly. Sources: OLA 19951; TILDA2.
Contents
Can an elderly person claim compensation after a slip and fall in Ireland?
Yes. An older person injured in a fall on someone else's premises can claim compensation under the Occupiers' Liability Act 19951, provided the occupier breached their duty of care. Age does not reduce the right to claim. The Act imposes a duty on occupiers to take reasonable care for the safety of all lawful visitors, including elderly shoppers, guests, and pedestrians.
A premises owner who fails to fix a known hazard, such as a wet floor, a broken step, or an unlit car park, is potentially liable when any visitor is injured. The obligation increases when the occupier knows or should know that older visitors regularly use the premises. Supermarkets, hotels, hospitals, and public footpaths all carry this duty.
One detail that surprises many families: the claim belongs to the injured person, not to the family. A son or daughter cannot start a claim independently. They can, however, assist with evidence gathering and instruct a solicitor on the injured person's behalf, particularly when the parent is unable to manage alone. Where the person lacks capacity, formal legal mechanisms exist to allow a family member to act. More on this below.
| Location | Typical hazards | Likely liable party |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarket or shop | Wet floors, spills, cluttered aisles, uneven mat edges | Store owner or management company |
| Public footpath or pavement | Broken slabs, raised paving, tree root damage, poor lighting | Local authority (city or county council) |
| Hotel or guesthouse | Polished floors, loose carpeting, poorly lit stairs, bathroom surfaces | Hotel operator |
| Shopping centre common area | Wet entrance from rain, escalator approaches, tiled concourse | Centre management company |
| Hospital or clinic (as visitor) | Wet corridors, medical equipment in walkways, automatic doors | HSE or private hospital operator |
| Church or community hall | Uneven thresholds, worn steps, poor external lighting | Parish, diocese, or community group |
| Car park | Potholes, oil spills, poor drainage, inadequate lighting, speed ramps | Car park operator or property owner |
The liable party depends on who owns, occupies, or controls the premises. In some cases (a leased shopping centre unit, for example), liability may fall on more than one party.
Why are fall injuries more serious for older people?
Falls cause disproportionately severe outcomes in older adults because of reduced bone density, slower healing, and a higher risk of complications. The HSE Falls Review Guide (2022) [6] recorded 34,114 falls in HSE and HSE-funded services in 2021, with 19% causing documented harm.
A younger adult who slips on a wet supermarket floor might walk away with bruising. The same fall for a 75-year-old with osteoporosis can fracture a hip, require surgery, trigger months of immobility, and permanently end independent living. The Irish Hip Fracture Database (2020 Report) [7] confirms that 95% of hip fractures follow a low-trauma fall, and the vast majority occur in people over 65.
TILDA data2 shows that approximately 62,000 older adults in Ireland require medical care annually after falls, with over 32,000 presenting to emergency departments. The risk increases sharply for adults over 70, and those over 80 face the highest rates of hip fracture and post-fall complications. The medical reality creates a chain reaction: fall, then fracture, then surgery, then immobility, then infection risk, then loss of independence, and in some cases, the need for permanent residential care. The Independence Loss Chain diagram above illustrates each stage, and each stage carries a distinct head of compensable damage.
What is the Age-Impact Multiplier?
The Age-Impact Multiplier is the principle that a claimant's age amplifies every element of a personal injury claim, from injury severity through to care costs and procedural urgency. While this term is not a formal legal concept, it describes a pattern that runs through every elderly fall case handled in Irish courts.
Five factors drive the multiplier effect:
Five factors that amplify elderly fall claims in Ireland:
Bone density: Osteoporosis turns minor falls into complex fractures requiring surgical repair.
Healing capacity: Recovery takes months rather than weeks, pushing injuries into higher Guidelines brackets.
Complication risk: Post-surgical infection, pneumonia, and deep vein thrombosis are more common during prolonged immobility.
Independence threshold: A fall can permanently end the ability to live at home, creating large special damages for care.
Procedural urgency: Health may decline during the claim itself, complicating medical evidence and prognosis.
The Guidelines5 do not contain a separate "elderly" category. However, judges assess recovery prognosis on a case-by-case basis. When a 78-year-old's wrist fracture causes permanent grip loss that a 35-year-old would recover from within a year, the award moves from the minor bracket into the moderate-to-serious range.
Age-Impact Assessment Tool
Select your situation to see which heads of damage may apply and the relevant Guidelines bracket. This is general guidance only and does not constitute legal advice. Actual awards vary case-by-case.
Judicial Council Personal Injuries Guidelines (2021). These ranges are for general damages only. Special damages (care costs, modifications, equipment) are calculated separately and can substantially increase the total. Every case is assessed on its own facts.
What is the eggshell skull rule and how does it apply to older claimants?
The eggshell skull rule (also called the thin skull principle) means a defendant in Ireland must take the claimant as they find them, including all pre-existing conditions and vulnerabilities. The Irish High Court reaffirmed this principle in Higgins v Coleman and Motor Insurers' Bureau of Ireland (2025), holding that pre-existing physical and psychiatric vulnerability does not reduce a defendant's liability.
For an elderly claimant with osteoporosis, this rule is critical. A supermarket that leaves a spill unattended cannot argue "a younger person wouldn't have broken a hip." The occupier is liable for the full extent of the injury, regardless of the claimant's age or bone condition.
A related but distinct concept is the crumbling skull principle. Where a condition was already deteriorating before the accident (for example, advanced osteoarthritis), the defendant is not responsible for the decline that would have happened anyway. The court must separate accident-caused harm from pre-existing deterioration. Achieving this separation requires detailed medical evidence from a specialist geriatrician or orthopaedic consultant. The difference between a successful and an unsuccessful elderly claim often comes down to the quality of this medical report.
What injuries do older people commonly suffer in falls?
Hip fractures are the most serious common injury in elderly falls, with the Irish Hip Fracture Database7 recording that 95% result from low-trauma falls. Wrist fractures, shoulder injuries, spinal compression fractures, and head injuries also occur frequently in this age group.
| Injury | Severity | General damages range |
|---|---|---|
| Hip fracture | Minor (full recovery 2-5 years) | €12,000 to €35,000 |
| Hip fracture | Severe (permanent disability) | €50,000 to €165,000 |
| Wrist fracture | Moderate to serious (ongoing symptoms or permanent limitation) | €16,000 to €45,000 |
| Lower back injury | Moderate to serious | €18,000 to €80,000 |
| Ankle fracture | Moderate to serious | €18,000 to €50,000 |
Judicial Council Personal Injuries Guidelines (2021)5. Awards vary case-by-case. These are general damages only and do not include special damages. The proposed 16.7% uplift was not brought forward and these brackets remain in force.
Where multiple injuries result from a single fall (a fractured wrist from bracing and a hip fracture from impact), the court identifies the dominant injury and applies an uplift for secondary injuries. The Court of Appeal in Zaganczyk v John Pettit Wexford Unlimited Company established that this combined total must pass a "reality check" against other serious injury categories in the Guidelines.
Beyond the physical injuries, elderly fallers frequently develop post-fall psychological harm that is separately compensable under general damages. Fear of falling (known clinically as ptophobia) affects a significant proportion of older adults after a fall. The person avoids leaving home, stops walking unaided, withdraws from social activity, and develops anxiety or depression. This activity avoidance accelerates physical decline, creating a secondary spiral of reduced mobility and increased frailty. The Guidelines5 provide separate brackets for psychological injury, and where fear of falling substantially reduces a claimant's quality of life, it forms an additional head of general damages on top of the physical injury award.
How does age affect the value of a compensation claim?
Age often increases total compensation in Irish elderly fall claims, because the consequences of a fall are more severe and the care costs are more immediate. While an elderly claimant typically won't claim large future loss of earnings (as they may already be retired), the special damages profile shifts toward loss of independence, home modifications, and professional care costs.
The single largest head of damage in many elderly fall cases is the cost of transitioning from independent living to supported or residential care. Under the Nursing Homes Support Scheme Act 2009 [8] (the "Fair Deal" scheme), the State contributes to nursing home costs, but the claimant's own contribution can be substantial. A successful injury claim must account for whether the need for residential care was caused or accelerated by the fall.
If the claimant lived independently before the fall: Special damages may include the full cost of transitioning to supported living or 24-hour home care, including stairlifts, wet room conversion, grab rails, and professional carer hours.
If the claimant already received some care: Damages cover only the additional care made necessary by the fall injury, not the pre-existing care arrangement.
If the claimant dies as a result of the fall: Dependants may bring a claim under Part IV of the Civil Liability Act 1961 [9] for loss of dependency, funeral costs, and loss of services.
Can the defendant argue an older person was partly at fault?
Yes. Defendants in Ireland routinely plead contributory negligence against elderly claimants, arguing the person should have used a walking aid, worn appropriate footwear, or avoided the area altogether. Under Section 34 of the Civil Liability Act 1961, compensation is reduced proportionally to the claimant's share of responsibility.
In practice, this defence does not always succeed. In Baldwin v National Museum of Ireland (2019), the museum argued that a 70-year-old tourist was "rushing to descend and was not paying attention" when he fell on polished marble stairs with an inadequate handrail. Ms Justice O'Hanlon rejected the contributory negligence argument entirely and awarded €67,000. She drew an adverse inference from the museum's failure to call expert evidence on the stairway design.
Practical insight: Defendants in elderly fall cases almost always argue the claimant's own frailty contributed. A detail that catches many families off guard: the insurer will request the claimant's full GP records going back years, looking for evidence of mobility problems, previous falls, or medication side effects. Early preparation with a solicitor helps manage this disclosure.
Medication history cuts both ways. TILDA research2 shows that nearly half of older adults who fall are prescribed falls-risk increasing drugs (FRIDs), such as sedatives, blood pressure medications, or antidepressants, that cause dizziness or unsteadiness. Defendants use this to argue contributory negligence. However, the same evidence can strengthen the claimant's case: a premises owner who knows elderly customers regularly visit (a pharmacy, a GP waiting room, a supermarket) should foresee that some visitors will be less steady on their feet due to medication. The hazard must be managed for the visitors who actually use the premises, not only for perfectly healthy adults.
What the occupier's insurer will typically argue
Families should expect three lines of defence in almost every elderly fall claim. First, the insurer will argue the claimant should have used a walking aid or worn more appropriate footwear. Second, the insurer will argue the hazard was "open and obvious" and a reasonable person would have avoided it. Third, the insurer will argue the injuries are the natural consequence of the claimant's age and pre-existing conditions, not the fall itself. Knowing these arguments in advance allows the solicitor to build evidence that directly counters each one from the outset.
What evidence strengthens an elderly fall claim?
Strong evidence in an elderly fall claim combines standard liability proof with age-specific medical documentation. The occupier's duty and breach must be established through the same channels as any public liability claim, but the medical evidence carries extra weight.
The 48-hour family action plan
The first two days after an elderly parent's fall are the most critical window for preserving evidence. Families should take these steps in order:
0 of 5 steps completed
| Evidence type | Why it matters for elderly claims | Time-sensitive? |
|---|---|---|
| CCTV footage | Shows the hazard existed before the fall and how long it went unaddressed | Yes: typically overwritten within 14 to 30 days |
| Accident report book entry | Creates a contemporaneous record linking the fall to the specific premises hazard | Yes: request a copy on the day |
| Photographs of the hazard | Documents the defect, wet surface, or obstruction before it is cleaned or repaired | Yes: take photos immediately |
| Witness contact details | Corroborates how the fall happened and that the hazard was present | Yes: memories fade quickly |
| GP and hospital records | Establishes the baseline health condition before the fall and the acute injury after | Request within weeks of the accident |
| Specialist geriatric report | Distinguishes pre-existing conditions from accident-caused harm (eggshell skull vs crumbling skull) | Commission early to capture accurate post-accident status |
| Maintenance and cleaning logs | Shows whether the premises had adequate inspection systems in place | Request via solicitor before logs are overwritten |
CCTV retention is the single biggest evidence risk. Most commercial premises overwrite footage on a rolling cycle. A solicitor's preservation letter, sent within days, can compel the occupier to retain the recording. Without it, the strongest proof of what caused the fall may be permanently lost.
When an occupier fails to preserve CCTV after being put on notice, Irish courts can apply the principle of omnia praesumuntur contra spoliatorem: everything is presumed against the party who destroyed the evidence. In Baldwin v National Museum of Ireland (2019), Ms Justice O'Hanlon criticised the museum for failing to produce CCTV evidence or present witnesses who had viewed the footage, and drew an adverse inference against them. For elderly claimants whose families may be slow to instruct a solicitor, the occupier's failure to keep recordings can become a strength rather than a weakness in the case.
Who makes the claim when the injured person cannot?
A family member can act on behalf of an elderly claimant in Ireland who lacks the capacity to manage legal proceedings, through the formal "next friend" procedure or under a decision-making arrangement. The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 [10], which commenced on 26 April 2023, provides the modern framework for supported and substitute decision-making in Ireland.
If the person has capacity but needs help: They can instruct a solicitor directly. A family member can attend appointments, gather evidence, and assist practically without any formal legal arrangement.
If the person lacks capacity to instruct a solicitor: A family member can apply to act as "next friend" in the proceedings. The court must approve this arrangement to protect the person's interests.
If the person had an enduring power of attorney in place before losing capacity: The appointed attorney can instruct the solicitor and make decisions about the claim on the person's behalf.
If the person dies from injuries: Dependants can bring a separate claim under Part IV of the Civil Liability Act 19619 for loss of dependency and related costs.
The timing matters more than most guides suggest: common delays in elderly claims stem from family hesitation around capacity questions. Early engagement with a solicitor avoids losing critical evidence while the family works through these arrangements.
How does the Injuries Resolution Board process work for elderly claims?
All public liability claims in Ireland, including elderly fall claims, must be submitted to the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB), formerly known as the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB), before court proceedings can begin. The Personal Injuries Resolution Board Act 2022 [11] modernised this process and introduced mediation as an option from 8 May 2024 for public liability claims.
The IRB assesses quantum based on medical evidence and the Guidelines5. Both parties can accept or reject the assessment. Acceptance produces an Order to Pay with the same force as a court order. Rejection leads to an authorisation allowing the claimant to issue court proceedings. Unlike in England and Wales, where there is no equivalent mandatory assessment body, all personal injury claims in Ireland (except medical negligence) must pass through the IRB before litigation can begin.
The IRB statistics don't capture one critical nuance about elderly claims: the quality of the Form B medical report matters more than in a standard case. The reporting doctor must clearly separate pre-existing conditions from accident-caused injuries to satisfy the eggshell skull rule requirements. A generic GP letter is rarely sufficient. Specialist orthopaedic or geriatric reports carry far more weight in assessment.
Choosing the right specialist is a decision many families get wrong. An orthopaedic surgeon assesses fracture severity, surgical outcomes, and long-term mobility prognosis. A consultant geriatrician assesses functional baseline before and after the fall, cognitive impact, medication interactions, and the overall effect on daily living and independence. In complex elderly claims where both a fracture and a decline in cognitive function or independence are in issue, reports from both specialists may be needed. Instructing the wrong expert first can delay the claim by months.
What is the time limit for an elderly fall claim?
You have two years from the date of the accident to submit your application to the IRB. The Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act 1991 [12] also allows the clock to start from the "date of knowledge" in cases where the claimant was not immediately aware of the injury's seriousness.
Urgent for elderly claims: The two-year legal deadline is only part of the picture. CCTV footage is typically overwritten within 14 to 30 days. Witness memories fade within weeks. The claimant's own health may deteriorate during the claim, making it harder to distinguish between accident-related decline and age-related decline. Early medical assessment and prompt solicitor instruction are not just advisable. They are often decisive.
One aspect the official guidance doesn't cover: some elderly fall injuries take weeks to reveal their true severity. A chronic subdural haematoma (bleeding on the brain) can develop gradually after a seemingly minor head strike, causing confusion and personality changes that families initially attribute to ageing rather than injury. The Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act 199112 provides for this: the two-year clock can start from the "date of knowledge," meaning the date the claimant (or their family) first became aware that the injury was significant and attributable to the fall. Families who notice a sudden cognitive decline weeks after a parent's fall should seek both medical reassessment and legal advice promptly.
Children of elderly parents often contact solicitors months after a fall because the family's immediate focus was medical care, not legal action. The limitation period protects against losing the right to claim entirely, but by that point, the best evidence may already be gone. Unlike in England and Wales, where the limitation period is three years under the Limitation Act 1980, Ireland's two-year window is shorter and creates more urgency for elderly claimants and their families.
At this point, the question shifts from "can I claim?" to "what is the claim actually worth?" The next section covers the distinct special damages profile that applies to older claimants.
What special damages apply to elderly fall claimants?
Elderly claimants in Ireland have a distinct special damages profile centred on loss of independence, home modifications, and professional care costs rather than future loss of earnings. These out-of-pocket and future expenses are calculated separately from general damages (pain and suffering) and can substantially increase the total award.
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Home modifications | Stairlift installation, wet room conversion, grab rails, widened doorways, ramp access |
| Professional care | Home help hours, private nursing, overnight care, Fair Deal top-up costs |
| Medical treatment | Orthopaedic consultations, physiotherapy (home-based or clinic), medication, specialist geriatric assessment |
| Assistive equipment | Mobility aids, lifting cushions, hospital bed rental, personal alarm systems |
| Transport | Ambulance charges, taxi fares to medical appointments, adapted vehicle costs |
| Loss of household services | Cost of replacing tasks the claimant can no longer perform, such as cooking, cleaning, gardening, or caring for a spouse or grandchildren |
One head of special damage that families frequently overlook: loss of capacity to provide services to others. Many older people in Ireland are the primary carers for a spouse with health needs, the regular minders of grandchildren, or the person who manages a household for a wider family. A fall that ends these contributions creates a quantifiable financial loss. The court can award the cost of hiring a replacement carer, childminder, or domestic helper for the period the claimant can no longer provide those services. Documenting these roles before or immediately after the fall (through family statements and GP records) substantially strengthens this part of the claim.
In catastrophic elderly fall cases, special damages can exceed general damages by a large margin. A hip fracture that ends independent living and requires full-time residential care creates annual costs running into tens of thousands of euro, capitalised over the claimant's remaining life expectancy. Actuarial evidence converts these future costs into a present-day lump sum.
When should you speak with a solicitor about an elderly fall claim?
Contact a solicitor within days of the fall, not weeks. The practical window for preserving CCTV, accident reports, and witness evidence is narrow. Once that evidence is lost, even a strong liability case becomes harder to prove.
A solicitor experienced in public liability claims in Ireland can send a preservation letter to the premises owner, request CCTV retention, begin medical evidence collection, and assess whether contributory negligence arguments are likely to arise. Early action also helps families navigate capacity questions before they become obstacles.
The assessment is typically free of charge for personal injury cases handled on a no-win, no-fee basis. The solicitor's fees are not calculated as a percentage of any award or settlement.
Related guides: Slip, trip and fall claims · Fracture injury claims · Public liability compensation · Time limits · Settlement vs court
Common questions about elderly slip and fall claims
Should an elderly person go to A&E or the GP after a fall?
Attend A&E or an urgent care centre if the person cannot bear weight, has hit their head, or is in significant pain. For less severe injuries, a GP visit within 24 hours creates an essential medical record.
The timing of this first medical visit matters legally because it connects the injury to the fall in a documented, time-stamped record. A gap of days or weeks between the fall and the first medical assessment gives the insurer room to argue the injury had a different cause or was not as serious as claimed. For head injuries in older adults, A&E attendance is particularly important because delayed intracranial bleeding may not produce symptoms for days or weeks.
Why it matters: The medical record from the first visit becomes the foundation of the entire claim.
Next step: Bring the accident report book entry and any photographs to the medical appointment.
Does osteoporosis affect the right to claim?
No. The eggshell skull rule means the defendant takes the claimant as they find them. Pre-existing osteoporosis that made a fracture more severe does not reduce the right to compensation.
The medical report must clearly distinguish between the pre-accident bone condition and the acute injury caused by the fall. Courts accept that osteoporosis increases fracture risk, and they hold the negligent occupier responsible for the resulting harm.
Why it matters: Insurers regularly argue that osteoporosis, not the fall, caused the fracture. A specialist medical report defeats this argument.
Next step: Medical evidence guide
Can the defendant argue the claimant should have used a walking aid?
A defendant can argue contributory negligence on this basis, but it does not automatically succeed. The court assesses whether the claimant acted reasonably in the circumstances. Many older people do not use walking aids in everyday settings such as supermarkets and hotels.
The key question is whether the hazard should have been prevented by the occupier, not whether the visitor could have protected themselves better. The occupier's duty of care exists precisely because visitors, including those with reduced mobility, have a right to expect safe premises.
Why it matters: This defence is raised frequently but fails when the occupier's own negligence is clearly established.
Next step: Duty of care explained
Does this page cover falls inside nursing homes?
No. Falls inside a nursing home or residential care facility involve a different duty of care owed by the institution to its residents. Those claims involve clinical standards, staffing ratios, and HIQA inspection reports. They may overlap with medical negligence rather than standard public liability.
The guidance on this page covers falls in general public and commercial spaces, such as supermarkets, shops, hotels, footpaths, car parks, and public buildings, where the older person was present as a member of the public.
Why it matters: The legal analysis for institutional care falls is different from premises liability falls in public places.
Next step: Hospital visitor claims
Can family members claim if an elderly relative dies after a fall?
Yes. Part IV of the Civil Liability Act 19619 allows dependants to claim for loss of dependency, funeral expenses, and loss of services previously provided by the deceased. The cap on damages for mental distress under fatal injury claims is €35,000.
The claim is separate from any personal injury claim the deceased may have had. A solicitor can advise on whether both claims may run simultaneously or sequentially.
Why it matters: Many families do not realise they have a separate legal right after a parent's death from fall injuries.
Next step: Speak with a Dublin solicitor
Can you claim against a local authority for a fall on a footpath?
Yes. Local authorities owe a duty of care under the Occupiers' Liability Act 19951 to maintain public footpaths, parks, and common areas. A broken pavement, uneven surface, or missing drain cover can ground a claim when the council knew or should have known about the defect.
These claims have particular significance for older pedestrians. A trip hazard of a few centimetres that a younger person might step over can cause a catastrophic fall for someone with reduced balance or mobility. The standard of care requires the council to anticipate foreseeable users, including elderly pedestrians.
Why it matters: Council claims require evidence that the defect was reported or should have been discovered through reasonable inspection.
Next step: Local authority claims guide
What if the IRB assessment seems too low?
You can reject the IRB assessment. The Board will issue an authorisation allowing you to bring court proceedings. Neither party is required to accept the assessment amount.
Elderly claims are sometimes undervalued at IRB stage because the full extent of long-term care needs is not yet clear when the assessment is made. A solicitor can advise whether the assessment reflects the likely court outcome or whether proceeding to the Circuit Court (for claims up to €60,000 in general damages) or the High Court (above €60,000) is appropriate.
Why it matters: Accepting a low assessment is final. You cannot return later for more if care needs increase.
Next step: Settlement vs court
What is the difference between the eggshell skull and crumbling skull rules?
The eggshell skull rule means the defendant pays for all injury consequences, even those amplified by the claimant's pre-existing vulnerability. The crumbling skull principle limits this: where the claimant's condition was already deteriorating independently of the accident, the defendant is not responsible for the decline that would have happened anyway.
The distinction requires detailed medical evidence separating accident-caused harm from the natural progression of a pre-existing condition. For elderly claimants with arthritis, osteoporosis, or cognitive decline, this separation is often the most contested part of the case.
Why it matters: Getting this distinction right determines how much compensation is awarded for the fall versus how much is attributed to existing health conditions.
Next step: Discuss the medical evidence strategy with your solicitor before commissioning reports.
How much does it cost to make a claim?
Most personal injury solicitors in Ireland handle elderly fall claims on a no-win, no-fee basis. The IRB application fee is €45 when submitted online or €90 by post or email4. There may also be costs for medical reports and specialist assessments, which the solicitor typically advances and recovers from the settlement.
A solicitor's fees cannot be calculated as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement. This is a requirement under the Law Society of Ireland [13] regulations.
Why it matters: Cost should not be a barrier to pursuing a legitimate claim for an elderly family member.
Next step: Free case assessment
What else should families consider after an elderly fall?
Council footpath falls: Local authorities owe the same duty of care under the Occupiers' Liability Act 19951. The claim process is identical, but proving the council had notice of the defect is often the decisive factor.
Death during proceedings: The personal injury claim survives the claimant's death and can be continued by the estate's personal representative. Separately, dependants can bring a fatal injury claim under Part IV of the Civil Liability Act 19619.
Disagreeing with the IRB: Either party can reject the assessment. The IRB then issues an authorisation allowing the claimant to bring court proceedings. Elderly claims are sometimes undervalued at IRB stage because the long-term care picture is not yet clear. A solicitor can advise whether the assessment reflects probable court value or whether litigation is the stronger option.
References
- Occupiers' Liability Act 1995, Irish Statute Book
- The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), Trinity College Dublin
- Injuries Resolution Board
- Injuries Resolution Board process, Citizens Information (Updated 2025)
- Personal Injuries Guidelines (2021), Judicial Council
- Service User Falls: A Practical Guide for Review, HSE (2022)
- Irish Hip Fracture Database, National Office of Clinical Audit
- Nursing Homes Support Scheme Act 2009, Irish Statute Book
- Civil Liability Act 1961, Irish Statute Book
- Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015, Irish Statute Book
- Personal Injuries Resolution Board Act 2022, Irish Statute Book
- Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act 1991, Irish Statute Book
- Law Society of Ireland
Gary Matthews Solicitors
Medical negligence solicitors, Dublin
We help people every day of the week (weekends and bank holidays included) that have either been injured or harmed as a result of an accident or have suffered from negligence or malpractice.
Contact us at our Dublin office to get started with your claim today
