Local Authority Accident Claims in Ireland

A local authority accident claim in Ireland is not a standard negligence case. Under Section 13 of the Roads Act 1993 (Updated April 2026), councils maintain public roads and footpaths, yet Irish common law grants them near-total immunity when they simply fail to maintain them. You can only succeed by proving misfeasance, meaning the council did something that created the danger. All claims must first go through the Injuries Resolution Board (Updated April 2026). This page explains the legal tests, the evidence you need, and the traps that defeat most claims before they start.

Contents

Legal test: Misfeasance only. Councils are immune for non-feasance (mere failure to repair). Roads Act 1993, s.13

Time limit: Two years from the date of the accident or date of knowledge. Citizens Information

First step: Apply to the Injuries Resolution Board. IRB process

Insurer: Most councils are insured by IPB Insurance, not self-insured. IPB claims

What is a local authority accident claim?

A local authority accident claim is a personal injury claim brought against a city council or county council in Ireland after someone is injured on land, infrastructure, or in a building the council controls. Under Section 13 of the Roads Act 1993, each local authority has a statutory function to maintain and construct public roads and footpaths in its area. That function covers everything from carriageways and kerbs to public lighting and drainage gullies.

Ireland has 31 local authorities: 26 county councils, 3 city councils (Dublin, Cork, Galway), and 2 city and county councils (Limerick, Waterford). Each one is responsible for the roads and footpaths within its administrative boundary. Claims against these bodies follow a different legal path to standard public liability claims because councils benefit from a legal protection that private occupiers do not have.

That protection is the non-feasance immunity rule. It is the single most important concept in this entire area of law, and most people, including some solicitors, don't fully understand how it works.

Which council is responsible?

In Ireland, the responsible council depends on where the accident happened. County councils maintain roads and footpaths outside any borough or town area, while city councils maintain roads and footpaths within their administrative boundary. If you tripped on a footpath in Drumcondra, Dublin City Council is the highway authority. If you fell in Swords, Fingal County Council is responsible.

Identifying the correct defendant early matters more than most people realise. If you name the wrong council in your IRB application, the respondent will deny responsibility. You then lose time re-filing against the correct body. If the two-year limitation period expires in the meantime, the claim could be statute-barred.

One detail that catches many claimants off guard: not every footpath is the council's responsibility. Footpaths inside housing estates that have not been formally "taken in charge" remain the responsibility of the original developer or the estate management company. National roads are maintained by local authorities but overseen by Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII). And footpaths disturbed by utility works may be the responsibility of the utility company, not the council. We cover these distinctions in the taken-in-charge section and the utility reinstatement section below.

The legal test: misfeasance vs non-feasance

Under Irish common law, a local authority cannot be sued for merely failing to repair a public road or footpath, a protection known as the non-feasance immunity rule. It means that if a council simply does nothing while a pavement crumbles over time, the council is not liable for injuries caused by that deterioration. Liability only arises when the council does something that creates or worsens a danger. That positive act of negligence is called misfeasance.

This distinction dates back to the English case of Russell v Men of Devon in 1788 and has been consistently applied by Irish courts ever since. The Irish Supreme Court described the rule as "anomalous" in O'Brien v Waterford County Council in 1926, and as "unsatisfactory" in Kelly v Mayo County Council in 1964. Despite this judicial criticism, the rule remains firmly in place (Irish Legal Guide, Roads and Misfeasance, Updated April 2026).

Why the rule hasn't changed

The Oireachtas actually legislated to abolish this distinction. Section 60(1) of the Civil Liability Act 1961 states that a road authority shall be liable for damage caused by failure to maintain a public road adequately. However, Section 60(7) required the Government to make a commencement order before this provision would take effect. Over 60 years later, no Government has ever signed that order.

The Supreme Court confirmed in State (Sheehan) v Government of Ireland [1987] IR 550 that the Government is not legally obliged to commence the section. The financial reasoning is straightforward: Ireland has approximately 99,000 kilometres of public road, roughly two and a half times the EU average per capita (Oireachtas, Road Safety Question, Updated April 2026). Activating Section 60 would expose local authorities to a flood of litigation for every pothole and uneven slab in the country.

As a result, the non-feasance rule retains what one High Court judge called its "ancient purity" in Irish jurisdiction.

What counts as misfeasance?

Misfeasance covers any positive act by the council that creates or worsens a hazard. The most common examples include faulty original construction of a footpath (wrong gradient, poor materials, substandard joints between slabs), a negligent repair that leaves the surface worse than before (badly compacted fill, uneven cold tarmac, a lip between the old and new surface), and a design that fails to meet the standards in the NRA or TII construction guidelines.

In Loughrey v Dun Laoghaire Corporation [2012] IEHC 502, the High Court found misfeasance where the differential between two footpath slabs was caused by faulty construction or poor specification. The court awarded the plaintiff a total of approximately 260,000 euro in damages.

In Falvey v Limerick County Council [2019] IEHC 858, Mr Justice Barton held that a junction design which failed to meet the recommended minimum corner radius in the NRA guidelines constituted misfeasance. Heavy goods vehicles had been mounting the footpath when turning, damaging it to the point where it became a tripping hazard.

What does not count: recent case law

In Long v Tipperary County Council [2024] IEHC 405, the plaintiff slipped on an accumulation of wet leaves and silt while walking her dogs on a public footpath. Her engineering expert argued the council designed the footpath with a slope that caused water to pond. Ms Justice Nuala Jackson found the plaintiff to be a "most honest witness" but ruled that the evidence did not prove the council had created a danger. The judge characterised the case as "a clear case of non-feasance rather than misfeasance." The plaintiff lost despite her genuine injuries (Irish Legal News, Updated April 2026).

This 2024 decision confirms that the non-feasance rule is not a relic. It is actively applied. A claim against a council will fail unless the evidence crosses the line from passive deterioration to active creation of danger.

The narrow exception: the trap doctrine

Irish courts have carved out one narrow exception to non-feasance immunity. The "trap" doctrine applies when a council creates a condition that appears safe but conceals a hidden danger. If a council undertakes works that simulate a safe surface while actually masking a hazard underneath, or removes an existing safety feature such as a protective fence or warning sign without replacing it, the council may be liable even though the claim superficially resembles non-feasance.

The distinction is subtle. A footpath that visibly crumbles over years is a known risk a pedestrian can see and avoid. A footpath that looks freshly repaired but conceals a void beneath the tarmac is a trap, because the council's positive act of repair created false confidence. The trap doctrine requires the hazard to be concealed from a reasonably careful user. If the danger was visible and obvious, the doctrine does not apply.

Tree root intrusion: an unresolved question

One area of Irish law that remains genuinely unsettled is whether damage caused by tree roots growing beneath a council footpath constitutes misfeasance or non-feasance. In 2024, the High Court heard a test case on this exact question. The plaintiff argued that because the council planted the trees and allowed the roots to grow unchecked, the resulting footpath damage was a foreseeable consequence of a positive act. The council argued it was pure non-feasance, a failure to act against a natural process.

Mr Justice O'Higgins recognised the novelty of the issue but ultimately declined to rule on it because the plaintiff had not proven where or how she fell. The legal question remains open. For anyone injured by a footpath lifted by tree roots, this is an evolving area of law where specialist legal advice is essential (Irish Legal News, Updated April 2026).

When the Occupiers' Liability Act applies to councils

Irish law draws a clear line between roads and buildings when it comes to council liability. In O'Riordan v Clare County Council [2021] IECA 267, the Court of Appeal confirmed that a highway authority is not the occupier of the highway. Noonan J. observed that the public has the right to pass and repass over the highway and cannot be excluded by the owner. This means the Occupiers' Liability Act 1995 does not apply to accidents on public roads and footpaths. Those claims are governed entirely by the misfeasance rule.

However, councils also control buildings and enclosed spaces. When you visit a county library, a civic office, a council-run leisure centre, or a public swimming pool, you are a visitor under the 1995 Act. The council owes you a duty of care to take reasonable steps to ensure you don't suffer injury from any danger on the premises.

The Courts and Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2023 amended the 1995 Act. Courts must now consider additional factors when assessing an occupier's duty, including the social utility of the activity, the cost and practicability of precautions, and whether the visitor voluntarily accepted the risk. These amendments strengthen a council's defence in relation to its buildings and recreational spaces, but they do not change the misfeasance rule for roads.

The Dual-Track Liability Test determines which regime applies. Track 1 (highway authority) governs roads, footpaths, and public highways. Track 2 (occupier) governs council buildings, parks (as enclosed premises), playgrounds, and leisure facilities. Identifying the correct track at the outset shapes every aspect of the claim.

Dual-Track Liability Test: which legal regime applies

Council asset	Legal track	Test for liability
Public road or footpath	Track 1: highway authority	Misfeasance only. Non-feasance immunity applies.
Library, civic office, leisure centre	Track 2: occupier (OLA 1995)	Reasonable care to visitors. 2023 Act factors apply.
Council-maintained playground	Track 2: occupier	Reasonable care plus EN 1176/1177 equipment standards.
Public park (enclosed)	Track 2: occupier	Reasonable care. Recreational user rules may also apply.

Common claim scenarios

Most local authority claims in Ireland involve footpath trips, pothole damage, falls in council buildings, or playground injuries, and each raises the same threshold question: did the council do something that created the danger, or did the danger develop through neglect?

Footpath trip on uneven slabs. The most common claim type. If the differential between slabs was caused by faulty original laying or a botched repair, it is misfeasance. If the slabs shifted over decades of natural settlement with no council intervention, it is non-feasance. For detailed guidance on measuring defects and gathering engineering evidence, see uneven surface accident claims.

Pothole on a public road. A pothole that formed through weather and traffic wear is non-feasance. A pothole that appeared at the site of a previous council repair that failed is misfeasance. The MapRoad Roadworks Licensing (MRL) database records every authorised road opening. A solicitor can cross-reference the accident location with MRL records to identify whether recent works were carried out at that spot.

Fall in a council building. A wet floor in a county library or a broken handrail in a civic office falls under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1995. The non-feasance rule does not apply. The council must show it took reasonable care. See our guide to proving a public liability claim.

Playground equipment failure. Council-maintained playground accident claims engage the Occupiers' Liability Act. The council is expected to inspect equipment at regular intervals and comply with the European playground equipment standards (EN 1176 and EN 1177 for impact-absorbing surfaces).

Falling debris from a council structure. If masonry or other material falls from a council-owned bridge, wall, or building, this is a positive act of poor maintenance. It typically constitutes misfeasance or a claim under the 1995 Act depending on the location. See falling object claims.

Night-time fall where public lighting has failed. Section 2(4) of the Roads Act 1993 explicitly defines the maintenance of a public road as including "the provision and maintenance of public lighting." If a council installed street lighting along a footpath (a positive act) and that lighting subsequently failed, making a defect invisible after dark, the lighting failure itself could constitute misfeasance of the installed system. This argument has not yet been tested in a reported Irish decision, but the statutory language supports it. If you fell at night near a broken streetlight, photograph the light as well as the defect, and report the lighting failure separately through the council's public lighting repair service.

The taken-in-charge question

Before claiming against a council for a footpath defect in a housing estate in Ireland, you must confirm the estate has been formally "taken in charge." Until that happens, the council has no liability for the internal roads and footpaths.

Taking in charge is the legal process by which a local authority assumes responsibility for roads, footpaths, public lighting, and drainage within a residential development. It is governed by Section 180 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 and Section 11 of the Roads Act 1993. The council passes a resolution declaring the internal roads as public roads. From that point, the council maintains them and the misfeasance rule applies.

Many housing estates in Ireland, particularly those built during the Celtic Tiger era, have never been taken in charge. In those estates, the developer or the owners' management company retains responsibility for footpath maintenance. If you trip on a broken footpath in an estate that hasn't been taken in charge, your claim is against the developer or the management company, not the council.

To check whether an estate has been taken in charge, contact the roads department or planning department of your local authority. Some councils publish lists of taken-in-charge estates on their websites. A solicitor can verify the status through a formal enquiry.

When the council is not liable: utility reinstatement

Approximately 30,000 utility openings are dug in Dublin's roads and footpaths every year, and similar patterns occur across Ireland. According to Dublin City Council data, about 40 per cent are dug by Uisce Eireann, 20 per cent by ESB Networks, and 12 per cent by Gas Networks Ireland. The remainder are divided between the council itself and telecoms companies.

When a footpath is dug up for utility works and then reinstated poorly, such as a temporary cold tarmac patch that sinks below the surrounding surface, liability may fall on the utility company or its contractor rather than the council. The engineering standard that governs reinstatement quality is the "Purple Book" (Guidelines for Managing Openings in Public Roads), published by the Department of Transport. If a contractor fails to meet the compaction, material, or depth specifications in the Purple Book, that failure is evidence of negligence.

Since the transfer of water and wastewater functions to Uisce Eireann under the Water Services (No. 2) Act 2013, defective water stopcocks, valve chambers, and sewer manhole covers on public streets may be the responsibility of Uisce Eireann rather than the council. The council retains responsibility for the surrounding pavement, but the metalwork and subterranean chamber belong to the utility.

Liability map: who is responsible for common hazards

Hazard	Usually responsible	Legal framework
Pothole on public road	Local authority	Misfeasance rule (non-feasance immunity applies)
Sunken utility trench	Utility contractor or utility company	Purple Book reinstatement standards
Defective sewer manhole	Uisce Eireann	Uisce Eireann Codes of Practice
Footpath in un-taken-in-charge estate	Developer or management company	Occupiers' Liability Act 1995
Wet floor in council library	Local authority (as occupier)	Occupiers' Liability Act 1995 (as amended 2023)

When both the council and a utility are at fault

In some cases, liability is shared. A utility contractor may have reinstated a footpath badly, and the council may have failed to follow up on the poor reinstatement despite receiving complaints. Under the Civil Liability Act 1961, where two or more parties each contributed to the same damage, they are concurrent wrongdoers. The claimant can pursue one or both. The court then apportions liability between them based on each party's degree of fault.

From a practical standpoint, this means your solicitor may need to name both the council and the utility company (or its contractor) as respondents in the IRB application. Getting the identification right at the outset avoids the risk of running out of time if one respondent denies responsibility and points to the other. A solicitor can check the MapRoad Roadworks Licensing database early to identify every entity that carried out works at the accident location in the preceding years.

Evidence that wins council claims

In Ireland, the single biggest reason council claims fail is that claimants wait until after the defect is repaired to seek legal advice. Once the council fixes the hazard, the physical evidence is gone, and proving misfeasance without it becomes extremely difficult.

Photograph the defect immediately. Use your phone to capture the hazard from multiple angles. Include a measurement reference such as a coin or ruler beside the defect. Note the exact location by street name, Eircode, and nearby landmarks or pole numbers.

Submit a Freedom of Information request. Under the Freedom of Information Act 2014, you can request all maintenance logs, inspection schedules, and internal communications relating to the specific location for the preceding three to five years. The council must acknowledge within two weeks and issue a decision within four weeks. If the disclosed records show the council previously attempted a repair at that location, you have evidence of misfeasance.

Report the defect in writing. Use fixyourstreet.ie, which covers all 31 local authorities, or your council's own online reporting form. Keep a screenshot or email confirmation with the date and reference number. A prior report establishes that the council had knowledge of the defect.

Seek medical attention. Attend your GP or hospital as soon as possible after the accident. Consistent medical records linking your injury to the fall are essential.

Identify witnesses. If anyone saw the fall, note their name and contact details. Witness evidence is particularly valuable when the council disputes how the accident happened.

Request the NIMS reference. All incidents reported to a local authority should be logged in the National Incident Management System (NIMS), operated by the State Claims Agency. Ask the council for the unique NIMS reference number associated with your report. This creates a timestamped official record that the council cannot later deny.

Cross-reference MRL records. A solicitor experienced in council claims will check the MapRoad Roadworks Licensing database to determine whether any utility company or contractor was licensed to excavate at or near the accident location. This identifies whether the defect was caused by a utility reinstatement rather than council works.

Request CCTV footage promptly. Many council areas and nearby businesses have CCTV that may have captured the accident. Under the Data Protection Act 2018, you can make a Subject Access Request for any footage that includes you. The critical constraint is time: most CCTV systems overwrite footage within 28 to 30 days. If you don't request it within that window, the footage is gone permanently. A solicitor can send a data preservation letter to the council and any nearby businesses within days of the accident.

How to report a defect to the council

Reporting a footpath or road defect to a local authority in Ireland serves two purposes: it may prompt the council to carry out a repair, and it creates a formal record that the council knew about the hazard, which is valuable evidence if you later need to make a claim.

Online: fixyourstreet.ie covers all local authorities nationally. You pin the location on a map, describe the hazard, and the system routes the report to the relevant council. Dublin City Council also accepts reports through its road maintenance service request form.

By phone or in person: Contact your council's customer services line. Note the name of the person you spoke to, the date, and any reference number given.

In writing: A letter or email to the council's roads department creates the strongest paper trail. Include the exact location, a description of the hazard, and any photographs. Keep a dated copy.

The reason this matters for claims: a council that received a report, attempted a repair, and did it badly is guilty of misfeasance. A council that received a report and did nothing is protected by non-feasance immunity. In both scenarios, the written report proves the council had knowledge. But only in the first does it create actionable liability.

The one-month notice rule

Under Irish law, specifically Section 8 of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 (Updated April 2026), a claimant must serve a formal written notice of claim on the respondent within one month of the accident. This letter must outline the wrong alleged and the nature of the injuries sustained. The original window was two months, but the Central Bank (National Claims Information Database) Act 2018 reduced it to one month, effective 28 January 2019.

Missing this deadline does not automatically bar the claim, but it has consequences. The trial judge can draw adverse inferences about the credibility of the claim and may impose cost penalties, potentially reducing or eliminating the recovery of legal fees even if the claim succeeds. In council claims, where IPB Insurance will defend rigorously, meeting this deadline matters.

The Section 8 notice is separate from any report you make to the council about the defect. Reporting a hazard through fixyourstreet.ie is not the same as serving a formal letter of claim. The Section 8 letter is a legal document addressed to the council as respondent, not a customer service request. A solicitor can draft and serve this notice on your behalf.

Time limits

The general time limit for a personal injury claim in Ireland is two years from the date of the accident or the date of knowledge (when you first became aware the injury was significant and attributable to the council's act). This applies equally to claims against local authorities. See our full guide to time limits for public liability claims.

For children, the two-year clock does not start until the child turns 18. A parent or guardian can bring the claim as "next friend" at any time before that. For adults who lack legal capacity due to injury, the clock is paused until capacity is restored.

Property damage claims (for example, vehicle damage from a pothole) have a longer limit of up to six years under the Statute of Limitations 1957.

This is an Irish-law-only rule. The UK applies a three-year limitation period under different legislation, specifically the Limitation Act 1980. That Act does not apply in Ireland. Some online resources conflate the two jurisdictions on this point, so check that any guidance you read is specific to Irish law.

What if you were partly at fault?

Councils and their insurers in Ireland routinely argue contributory negligence in footpath claims. Under the Civil Liability Act 1961, if the claimant's own carelessness contributed to the accident, the court reduces the damages by the percentage of fault attributed to the claimant. The claim is not defeated entirely, but the award is reduced.

Common contributory negligence arguments in council claims include the claimant was looking at a phone while walking and failed to notice a visible defect, the claimant was wearing unsuitable footwear for the conditions, the claimant was walking at night in an unlit area and could have chosen a different route, or the defect was obvious enough that a careful pedestrian would have avoided it.

The practical effect is significant. A 25 per cent finding of contributory negligence on a claim otherwise worth 40,000 euro reduces the award to 30,000 euro. IPB Insurance adjusts its settlement offers to reflect any contributory negligence risk it identifies in the evidence.

The key question is whether the defect was visible or concealed. A raised slab with a bright colour difference that a careful walker could spot attracts a stronger contributory negligence argument than a concealed void under what appears to be an intact surface. This is another reason why detailed photographs of the defect are essential. They help a solicitor assess how visible the hazard actually was at the time of the accident.

How compensation is assessed

Compensation for a local authority accident claim in Ireland is assessed using the same framework as any other personal injury claim, with general damages calculated under the Personal Injuries Guidelines 2021 (Updated April 2026), which replaced the previous statutory compensation guidelines. The 2021 Guidelines set standardised brackets for different injury types based on severity, duration, and permanent impact.

The proposed 16.7 per cent uplift to these brackets was rejected by the Government, and the High Court confirmed the uplift cannot be applied. The 2021 brackets remain in force.

Special damages cover all quantifiable financial losses: medical bills, physiotherapy, medication, travel to appointments, home modifications, and lost earnings (past and future). Properly documenting these losses from the outset can make a significant difference to the final award.

Where a claimant suffers multiple injuries, the assessor identifies the most significant injury, determines its bracket within the Guidelines, and applies a proportional uplift for the lesser injuries. The overall award must remain proportionate. See our guide to general damages.

Footpath falls disproportionately affect people over 65. A hip fracture in an elderly claimant typically attracts a higher award than the same fracture in a younger person, because the recovery is longer, the risk of permanent mobility loss is greater, and the impact on daily independence is more severe. Medical evidence in these cases often addresses the increased mortality risk associated with hip fractures in older adults, which is a factor courts take into account when assessing damages. If an elderly family member has fallen on a council footpath, early legal advice ensures the medical evidence captures the full long-term impact.

The IRB process for council claims

All personal injury claims against local authorities in Ireland must first be submitted to the Injuries Resolution Board. The IRB is an independent statutory body that assesses compensation. The application requires a completed form, a medical report from your treating doctor, and a processing fee (45 euro online, 90 euro by post).

The council or its insurer (usually IPB Insurance) has 90 days to consent to the assessment. If consent is given, the IRB generally issues an assessment within nine months. As of 2024, the consent rate from respondents stands at 70 per cent, up from 55 per cent in 2020.

A recent development: the IRB now offers a free, confidential mediation service as an alternative to formal assessment. For council claims, where both sides may prefer to avoid the cost and uncertainty of court, mediation can resolve the matter faster.

If either party rejects the IRB assessment, the Board issues an Authorisation. This releases the claim and allows the claimant to issue court proceedings. Depending on the value, the case will be heard in the Circuit Court (for claims up to 60,000 euro in personal injury) or the High Court (above that threshold). See settlement vs court.

How long does a council claim take?

A realistic timeline for a local authority claim in Ireland runs as follows. The Section 8 notice should be served within the first month. The IRB application is filed in months one to two. The council's insurer then has 90 days to consent to the IRB assessment. If consent is given, the IRB typically issues its assessment within nine months of consent. If the assessment is accepted by both sides, payment follows within weeks.

If the assessment is rejected and the claim goes to court, add 12 to 36 months depending on court listing delays and the complexity of the engineering evidence. Total realistic duration from accident to resolution: 12 months at the fastest (straightforward IRB settlement) to four years or more (contested court proceedings). Most council claims that settle through the IRB resolve within 15 to 24 months.

IPB Insurance is a mutual insurer owned by its public sector members. It insures the vast majority of local authorities and Education and Training Boards in Ireland. All settlement negotiations are conducted with IPB's claims handlers or their appointed solicitors, not with the council directly. In some cases involving broader State assets, the State Claims Agency may manage the claim under the General Indemnity Scheme.

Council payout data

Freedom of Information data published by The Journal in January 2026 revealed that Dublin City Council paid out approximately 52 million euro in total public liability claims between 2023 and September 2025. Of that, over 18 million euro related specifically to footpath injuries, covering 950 separate claims. In 2024 alone, DCC settled over 7.6 million euro in footpath injury compensation, up from 6 million euro in 2023.

Cork County Council paid approximately 18.6 million euro in public liability compensation over the same period, though that figure was inflated by two large settlements in 2024, one of which was a 9 million euro payout.

According to National Oversight and Audit Commission (NOAC) data and IPB Insurance reports, the average per capita cost of public liability settlements nationally rose to 13.74 euro in 2024, up from 12.40 euro in 2023 and 11.05 euro in 2021.

The IRB received 20,837 claims across all categories in 2024, of which 4,780 were public liability claims. The average cost of an assessed injury claim was approximately 39,537 euro in 2024.

These figures confirm that council claims are both common and financially significant. They also show that councils, through IPB Insurance, do settle claims. The issue is not whether councils pay, but whether the legal threshold of misfeasance is met.

Based in Dublin, serving clients nationwide across Ireland for all personal injury claims. No in-person meetings needed.

Frequently asked questions

Can I claim against the council if I tripped on a footpath?

Only if the council caused the defect through a positive act such as faulty construction or a negligent repair. If the footpath simply deteriorated over time without any council intervention, the non-feasance immunity rule protects the council from liability. A solicitor can assess whether the facts of your case point to misfeasance or non-feasance.

What is the difference between misfeasance and non-feasance?

Misfeasance is a positive act of negligence, such as a council repair crew filling a trench badly and leaving a tripping hazard. Non-feasance is a failure to act, such as allowing a footpath to crumble over years without attempting any repair. Irish councils are liable for misfeasance but immune from liability for non-feasance on public roads and footpaths.

How long do I have to claim against the council?

Two years from the date of the accident or the date of knowledge. You should also serve a Section 8 notice within one month of the accident to avoid cost penalties later. See our time limits guide.

Does reporting a defect to the council before an accident help my claim?

It can help establish that the council had knowledge of the hazard. However, knowledge alone is not enough. You still need to prove misfeasance. If the council knew about the defect, did nothing, and the defect was caused by natural deterioration, the non-feasance rule still applies. The prior report becomes powerful evidence only if the council attempted a repair and did it negligently.

What if the footpath was dug up by Irish Water or ESB?

If the defect was caused by poor reinstatement after utility works, liability may fall on the utility company or its contractor rather than the council. A solicitor can check the MapRoad Roadworks Licensing database to identify who was authorised to excavate at that location.

How do I know if my housing estate has been taken in charge?

Contact the roads department or planning department of your local authority. Some councils publish lists of taken-in-charge estates on their websites. If the estate has not been taken in charge, your claim is against the developer or management company, not the council.

Who actually pays the compensation in a council claim?

Most local authorities are insured by IPB Insurance, a mutual insurer for public sector bodies. Settlement negotiations are handled by IPB's claims team, not by the council's own staff. The compensation comes from the insurance policy, not from council budgets directly.

Does the Occupiers' Liability Act apply to footpath claims?

No. The Court of Appeal confirmed in O'Riordan v Clare County Council [2021] IECA 267 that a highway authority is not the occupier of the highway. The Occupiers' Liability Act 1995 applies to council buildings such as libraries, civic offices, and leisure centres, but not to public roads and footpaths. On roads, the misfeasance rule applies instead.

References

[1] Roads Act 1993, Section 13 — revisedacts.lawreform.ie
[2] Civil Liability Act 1961, Section 60 — irishstatutebook.ie
[3] Injuries Resolution Board — citizensinformation.ie
[4] IRB claims process — injuries.ie
[5] IPB Insurance claims — ipb.ie
[6] Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004, Section 8 — irishstatutebook.ie
[7] Planning and Development Act 2000, Section 180 — irishstatutebook.ie
[8] Occupiers' Liability Act 1995, Section 4 — revisedacts.lawreform.ie
[9] Freedom of Information Act 2014 — irishstatutebook.ie
[10] Personal Injuries Guidelines 2021 — judicialcouncil.ie
[11] National Incident Management System (NIMS) — stateclaims.ie
[12] fixyourstreet.ie — fixyourstreet.ie
[13] Dublin City Council footpath injury payouts (FOI) — thejournal.ie, January 2026
[14] NOAC Local Authority Performance Indicator Report 2024 — noac.ie
[15] Dublin City Council road maintenance — dublincity.ie
[16] Roads and Misfeasance (case law compilation) — legalguide.ie
[17] Long v Tipperary County Council [2024] analysis — irishlegal.com
[18] Tree root intrusion test case [2024] — irishlegal.com
[19] Road network statistics — oireachtas.ie

This is general information about local authority accident claims in Ireland, not legal advice. Every case depends on its specific facts. Consult a solicitor for advice on your situation. In contentious business, a solicitor may not calculate fees or other charges as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement.