Mediation Act 2017 Explained: Section 14 and the Solicitor's Pre-Action Duty in Ireland

What the Mediation Act 2017 Does

The Mediation Act 2017 is the first piece of dedicated mediation legislation enacted by the Oireachtas. It defines mediation in Irish law, sets the conduct standards for mediators, protects what is said in mediation as confidential, gives statutory force to a mediated settlement agreement, and most consequentially imposes a pre-action duty on every practising solicitor in the State to advise a client to consider mediation before issuing civil proceedings (section 14, irishstatutebook.ie).

The Act applies to all civil proceedings in Ireland with a list of exceptions set out in section 3. Personal injury actions, medical negligence actions, and most other civil claims are within scope. The exceptions include arbitrations under the Arbitration Act 2010, Workplace Relations Commission matters, certain tax-related proceedings, judicial review, proceedings under the Domestic Violence Acts 1996 to 2011, and proceedings under the Child Care Acts 1991 to 2015. The Long Title describes the legislative purpose as "to facilitate the settlement of disputes by mediation" and to provide arrangements for mediation as an alternative to either the institution of civil proceedings or the continuation of civil proceedings already on foot.

Key Sections

Four section groupings do most of the work in personal injury practice: sections 2 and 3 (definition and scope), sections 10 and 11 (confidentiality and settlement enforcement), section 14 (the solicitor's pre-action duty), and sections 16 and 21 (court invitation and the costs sanction).

Sections 2 and 3 — What Counts as Mediation, and What the Act Covers

Section 2 defines mediation in Irish law as a confidential, facilitative and voluntary process in which the parties to a dispute, with the assistance of a mediator, attempt to reach a mutually acceptable agreement (s.2, irishstatutebook.ie). The three adjectives are doctrinally important: a process that is not voluntary, or not confidential, or where the third party imposes an outcome rather than facilitating one, falls outside the Act and outside its protections.

Section 3 sets the application boundary. The Act does not apply to arbitrations under the Arbitration Act 2010, certain Workplace Relations Commission matters, specified tax proceedings (Appeal Commissioners, the Taxes Consolidation Act, the Customs Act), judicial review and constitutional rights proceedings, proceedings under the Domestic Violence Acts 1996 to 2011, or proceedings under the Child Care Acts 1991 to 2015 (s.3, irishstatutebook.ie). Personal injury actions in the High Court and Circuit Court are squarely within the Act. Note that the family-law carve-outs from the section 14 solicitor's duty (guardianship, judicial separation, divorce) sit separately in section 14(4) — they limit the solicitor's pre-action duty in those proceedings, but do not exclude those proceedings from the rest of the Act.

Sections 10 and 11 — Confidentiality and Enforcement of Settlement

Section 10 makes communications, records, and notes relating to a mediation confidential and inadmissible as evidence, subject to a closed list of five exceptions in section 10(2): disclosure necessary to enforce a settlement, to prevent physical or psychological injury, where required by law, to prevent or reveal a crime, and to prove or disprove a civil claim or professional complaint concerning the negligence or misconduct of the mediator (s.10, irishstatutebook.ie). The protection makes settlement-focused mediation workable in Irish PI practice: a plaintiff can disclose treatment history and a defendant can make a without-prejudice offer through the mediator, knowing neither will surface at trial if the mediation does not settle. Section 10(3) preserves the admissibility of evidence that was independently admissible before mediation — the protection runs to the mediation channel, not to underlying documents.

Section 11 gives a mediation settlement contractual force between the parties, unless the agreement expressly states otherwise (s.11, irishstatutebook.ie). Section 11(3) allows a party to apply to court to enforce the settlement, with the procedure set by the Rules of Court (S.I. Nos. 9, 11, 12 and 13 of 2018).

Section 14 — The Solicitor's Pre-Action Obligation

Section 14 of the Mediation Act 2017 is the provision that has reshaped Irish civil litigation practice since 2018. It places a personal statutory duty on every practising solicitor, before issuing proceedings on a client's behalf, to do five things set out in section 14(1)(a)–(e): (a) advise the client to consider mediation; (b) provide information about mediation services; (c) provide information about both (i) the advantages of resolving the dispute otherwise than by way of the proposed proceedings and (ii) the benefits of mediation; (d) advise that mediation is voluntary and may not be appropriate where the safety of the client or their children is at risk; and (e) inform the client of the matters covered in section 10 (confidentiality), section 11 (enforceability), section 14(2) (the statutory declaration) and section 14(3) (the court's adjournment duty) (s.14(1), irishstatutebook.ie).

Section 14(2) requires that, where proceedings are issued, the originating document — the personal injuries summons in High Court PI proceedings, the civil bill in the Circuit Court — must be accompanied by a statutory declaration sworn by the solicitor evidencing compliance. Section 14(3) is the enforcement mechanism: if the declaration is missing, the court "shall" adjourn the proceedings until it is filed. The High Court has confirmed that "shall" is mandatory — a trial judge must enquire whether the declaration has been sworn before hearing the case.

Sections 16 and 21 — Court Invitation to Mediate and the Costs Sanction

Section 16 lets a court, on the application of a party or on its own motion, invite the parties to consider mediation at any stage of the proceedings (s.16, irishstatutebook.ie). The court can adjourn proceedings, extend timelines, or make other directions to enable a mediation to take place. Section 17 then provides for a brief mediator's report when the proceedings are re-entered.

Section 21 supplies the costs lever. Where the court has invited mediation under section 16(1), the court may, when later awarding costs, take into account any unreasonable refusal or failure by a party to consider mediation, or to attend a mediation following the invitation (s.21, irishstatutebook.ie). Even a "winning" party who has unreasonably refused court-invited mediation can find their costs entitlement reduced.

How the Mediation Act 2017 Has Been Amended

The Mediation Act 2017 has not been substantively amended since enactment. Two adjacent legislative developments are worth noting because they sit alongside the Act in PI practice.

Leading Cases Interpreting the Mediation Act 2017

Reported case law on the Mediation Act 2017 is limited because procedural compliance, rather than legal interpretation, is what most disputes are about. Two High Court decisions stand out as the leading authorities on the operation of section 14.

How the Mediation Act 2017 Interacts with Other Legislation

Four interactions are central to Irish personal injury practice.

Statute of Limitations 1957: Section 18 of the Mediation Act 2017 disregards a defined period for limitation purposes. The clock stops on the day the parties sign an agreement to mediate complying with section 7, and starts running again 30 days after either the mediation settlement is signed by the parties and the mediator, or the mediation is terminated, whichever first occurs. The 30-day grace period beyond the end of mediation is legally significant for limitation-sensitive PI claimants. An informal mediation that does not comply with the section 7 formalities does not pause the clock at all.

Civil Liability Act 1961: Where multiple wrongdoers are involved and a mediated settlement is reached with one of them, the apportionment and contribution provisions of the 1961 Act still operate. A mediated settlement does not displace section 17 of the 1961 Act in relation to the liability of any non-settling wrongdoer.

Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 (PI-specific amendment): Section 22 of the Mediation Act 2017 amended section 15(1) of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 by inserting "or upon its own initiative" after "party to a personal injuries action". The practical effect is that, in personal injury actions specifically, the court can direct a mediation conference on its own motion without waiting for a party to apply. This sits alongside, and is wider in PI cases than, the general section 16 power in the Mediation Act itself.

Personal Injuries Resolution Board Act 2022: The 2022 Act introduced a statutory mediation pathway through the Injuries Resolution Board for certain PI claims. IRB mediation operates under its own statutory regime and is not the same process as Mediation Act 2017 mediation; the two systems sit side by side.

The Mediation Act 2017 in Practice

In practice, section 14 cases turn on whether the solicitor can produce a sworn declaration filed with the originating document — the substance of what was discussed with the client tends to be taken on the face of the declaration. The trial judges who have considered the section, particularly Kennedy J in Byrne and Twomey J in V Media, have stressed that the statutory duty is to advise the client to consider mediation, not to compel mediation or to ensure that mediation actually happens. A solicitor who has explained the option, recorded the advice in writing, and sworn the declaration has discharged the duty even if the client decides not to mediate.

The leading misreading of section 14 is that it requires mediation to be attempted before issuing proceedings. It does not. What it requires is that the client be informed about mediation and put in a position to make an informed choice. Kennedy J framed the rationale at paragraph 19 of Byrne: "For obvious reasons, the Oireachtas seldom interferes in lawyer/client relationships," and section 14 protects clients by ensuring they are fully informed about options that may reduce their exposure to cost and risk. Twomey J in V Media endorsed and built on that reasoning.

"… the 2017 [Act] makes clear that litigation should be the option of last resort, rather than first resort, when it comes to resolving disputes."

per Twomey J in V Media Doo & First Click Marketing Operations Management Limited v Techads Media Ltd [2025] IEHC 430

What changed after Byrne and V Media is the active enforcement posture. Practice Directions HC 127 (Non-Jury List) and HC 131 (Clinical Negligence) require the parties to confirm section 14 compliance in advance of obtaining a hearing date.

Frequently Asked Questions